|
|
Sunday, November 27

Why do many environmentalists hate biofuel?
by
amazngdrx
on Sun 27 Nov 2005 01:51 PM CST
http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2005/11/25/202912/19#2
Biofuel from the waste stream made with wind and solar power are still a great idea. I am opposed to agrichem biofuel too, even though I'm in favor of biofuel from waste.
When the waste stream biofuel runs short of demand, then coal can be refined cleanly with the same wind and solar powered technology to produce a blended fuel that will work in regular gasoline and diesel motors.
This would eliminate imported oil.
As plugin electric cars come into wide use, the percentage of transportation energy obtained from fuel combustion can be reduced so that eventually oil and even coal are no longer needed.
And with the mass production of the new lithium ion nano tech quick charge batteries, a fillup of a plugin electric "gas tank" will take only a little longer than filling a regular gas tank.
That means no more fuel will be needed. The remaining biofuel production can be reserved for specialized uses like air travel.
A distinction needs to be made between agrichem based biofuel and boifuel produced from waste with green energy. Regional green biofuel and coal extracted fuel would establish freedom from the economic tyranny of monopoly based neo-corporate empire and it's krazy kristian oil krusade.
Region by region progressive areas could get off their oil addiction and leave the regions paying 5 bucks per gallon for fuel and yearly double digit increases in heating and cooling bills in the financial dustbin of history.
Let 'em fund bushco and its saudi/opec cronies. See how long that lasts in free economic competition with whole regions powered with inexpensive, clean, green energy.
Only when this starts happening will politicos be forced to level the playing field for alternative energy. Until large numbers of voters actually see the benefits of green energy, the system of subsidizing big oil, nukes, and coal backed by bribery will surely continue. And no real reform energy policy will be instituted.
Tuesday, November 8

VW going to lithium ion for their new hybrid?
by
amazngdrx
on Tue 08 Nov 2005 03:58 PM CST
http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2005/11/3/92411/0383#1
If VW does it, can mass production of lithium ion hybrid batteries be far behind? Maybe even mass production of the fast charge Hitachi lithium ion battery?
That paves the way for affordable plugin electric cars that have the range and performance needed to compete with hybrids.
But the final blow to hybrids that use infernal combustion as the main power source is a plugin biofueled generator that substitutes for half the batteries in a plugin electric vehicle so that long trips without stopping to recharge become possible.
A battery pack in the trunk, for instance, that slides out and the biofuel generator slides in. No more main oil burning power source needed.
You visit your dealership and do the swap out for your vacation trip then swap back when the trip is over. That would leave maybe 1 in 10 cars actually needing the generator pack at any one time.
People who drive more miles than the plugin system would accomadate without recharge could just leave the generator in place permanently.
Tuesday, November 1

Closed session.
by
amazngdrx
on Tue 01 Nov 2005 03:20 PM CST
Well well, we were right all along. Somehow this disaster disguised as an administration has taken the joy out of being right.
Mass death over lies tends to do that.

Alito pro-choice?
by
amazngdrx
on Tue 01 Nov 2005 03:10 PM CST
Yes it's true.
He believes in choice...between semi-auto and full automatic fire for all americans.
He ruled that the federal government has no authority to outlaw the ownership of machine guns. Back to the roaring 20's you all, neeehaaaawww.
Thursday, October 6

Gristmill discussion on distributed power generation.
by
amazngdrx
on Thu 06 Oct 2005 04:52 PM CDT
http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2005/10/5/15453/7223#2
This sort of system lends itself to local power producers, those with wind, solar, and biofuel resources, teaming up with consumers in electrical cooperatives.
Producers and consumers, many members both producing and consuming owning and controlling local area power grids.
Think of farmers with manure digestors that produce natural gas, running generators to sell power to their neighbors with wind or solar power systems when the wind isn't blowing or the sun is not shining.
This could all fit together, even to the point of members producing ethanol or biodiesel from the waste stream to sell to other coop members.
And lots of small businesses would build and install the systems.
Starting out with small solar or wind systems that only replace a fraction of grid power in the home, reducing energy bills while paying their way in a few years from savings. As people become more comfortable with small inexpensive systems, they could then add on capacity, until gradually a local area grid supports itself with no outside input.
Given the complete and utter incompetence and corruption of government and big monopoly business, especially when they work fist in glove as this neoconman regime does, locally is the only way this energy revolution will ever get started.
Eventually local coops could pool resources to invest in larger wind, biofuel, and solar projects, replacing the old monopoly companies completely.
Friday, September 30

Practical local politics.
by
amazngdrx
on Fri 30 Sep 2005 04:36 PM CDT
Practical problem solving political action on the local level sells itself. There is where the poltical base lives.
If local green energy groups helps people convert to solar, wind, and biofuel energy and cut energy bills at the same time, that trumps lofty political principles.
If a political party supports government policy to make a more friendly financial environment for this to happen, votes will surely follow.
And small businesses building and installing the systems with equipment supplied by a revived american manufacturing base will result. Remember the 90s? The internet boom funded a pay down of the national debt.
But that boom went bust, only so many people needed the latest greatest internet technology.
This green energy boom is huge, replacing all that ever more expensive oil and natural gas. It is more than a bubble. It's a huge wave of prosperity, earth friendly prosperity.
Economic growth from biulding quality rather than consumption and quantity. Energy conservation and human productivity driving this wave. Let it roll.
Saturday, September 24

Real evacuation plans! Not bushco inc. "contracting" as usual.
by
amazngdrx
on Sat 24 Sep 2005 11:03 AM CDT
Traffic needs to be routed so that people are not left stranded as freeways become 100 mile long parking lots.
And no more bushco inc. contractors to study the problem, at huge cost to taxpayers and with zero results. Universities already funded by tax dollars can do the necessary computer modeling based directly on the traffic situation encountered in these recent botched evacuations.
We the people need to demand that our government solves problems, instead of throwing money at crony corporations like bushco inc. has.
By adjusting traffic patterns out onto side roads around stalled vehicles the millions that would need to evacuate our biggest metro areas like NYC would at least have some chance of survival.
In a nuclear fuel rod storage pool disaster, for instance, an area hundreds of miles in diameter downwind from the accident would need to be evacuated very quickly.
There are 68 of these facilities located all around the US, each of which could release 8 to 17 times the radiation of Chernobyl. Any loss of water in these open pools would cause the flammable zirconium metal in the rods to burn and the residual radiation to spread on the wind.
Tuesday, September 20

Zero tolerance (poem from jseven)
by
amazngdrx
on Tue 20 Sep 2005 09:23 AM CDT
vacation accomplished! (reality not allowed)
afterwards, the headlines despaired: "new orleans engulfed by despair & lawlessness"
conveniently forgotten: the jim crow law of cause & effect (blacks "loot" but whites "find")
conveniently forgotten: despair & lawlessness dwelt deep within the delta long before katrina
battered louisiana long before shattered levees sank the big easy
long before the secretary of state's shoe-shopping spree (poverty not permitted)
shoot to kill is a sugarcoated sleeping pill to help compassionate conservatives rest easier at night
& blaming the victims is fortified balloon bread that builds character & "makes america stronger for it"
© j7
Great job seven!!!! Thanks!! Classes up my blog.
Wednesday, September 14

Recall duuuhbya for criminal negligence.
by
amazngdrx
on Wed 14 Sep 2005 01:09 PM CDT
http://www.dhs.gov/dhspublic/display?theme=11&content=4353
On February 15, 2005, Judge Michael Chertoff was sworn in as the second Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security. Chertoff formerly served as United States Circuit Judge for the Third Circuit Court of Appeals.
Before joining the Bush Administration, Chertoff was a Partner in the law firm of Latham & Watkins. From 1994 to 1996, he served as Special Counsel for the U.S. Senate Whitewater Committee.
The neorat Chertoff's emergency managment experience.
Let's see, brownie was a disbarred horse judge. That criminally negligent appointment by the chimp in chief caused how many deaths? Thousands?
Meanwhile nursing home operators who allegedly caused 34 deaths are now charged with criminal negligence.
When will bushco (o)inc be charged?
How many deaths will Chertoff the whiterwater prosecutor cause meanwhile?
Isn't homeland security and emergency management important enough to appoint experts? Chertoff and brownie, rummi, wolfi...and on and on should be ambassadors or something, not in key life or death positions.
Recall Bush for criminally negligent crony appointments. The buck stops at duuuhbya.
Monday, September 12

What to do when global climate disaster appears.
by
amazngdrx
on Mon 12 Sep 2005 01:39 PM CDT
http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2005/9/11/124448/953#4
So if New Orleans is ready for a category 5 next time, what if a category 6 shows up?
With ever increasing weather volatility due to the greenhouse gas effect, in this case a warmer gulf water temperature than normal, disaster planning is not enough.
Reversal of global climate change won't help for a few decades either, even if a crash program were instituted tomorow. We have to live (and many will die) with this situation.
Storm resistant homes with decentralized power systems built farther back from coastlines is the only longer term solution. Give the coasts and wetlands back to mother nature. Thousands of miles of great coastal wilderness and camping areas will result.
Camp out at the beach on vacation instead of building fancy homes. It's a wonderful way to get in touch with nature and save energy and development.
Less homes built, less energy used, less global climate change greenhouse gases.
Let's talk peak climate change weather volatility for awhile along with peak oil. The costs from both are economy shattering!
Sooner or later the rest of US will be unable to pay to rebuild the coastal areas ravaged by ever increasingly intense storms. Federal zoning needs to be instituted. No rebuilding in coastal flood plains.
Friday, September 2

FO(AU)X news? Tabloidism mixed with politically correct (pro-bushco inc) censorship.
by
amazngdrx
on Fri 02 Sep 2005 07:31 AM CDT
Very interesting estimate of GDP loss from Katrina by FAUX news anchors this morn.
Faux talkin' head 1: " The economic losses from Katrina are estimated to be .05 % of GDP."
Faux talkin' head 2: "That's a very small amount..."
Faux talkin' head 1: "...that's more than the loss from 911."
The actual figure quoted in the mass delusional media? A mere 10 times that figure!?! Yep.
The ratings agency (Standard and Poors) predicted Katrina would shave 0.5 per cent off the U.S. real gross domestic product in the third quarter, a significant drop from the 3.3 per cent annual growth recorded in the second quarter.
Whoops, reading are hard. Poor talkin' heads.
Interview after interview at the scene feature FAUX news reporters cutting off Katrina victims who mention the duuuhbyaist regime in any hegative light with respect to the situation in New Orleans.
5 days with no food or water brought in by relief officialdome, citizens forced to loot to get even water! In 95+ degree heat! Armed thugs allowed to rule the city streets and designated shelter areas. Shooting, raping, beating at will.
Kind of reminds one of the Iraqi invasiion aftermath?
Why weren't police and national guard on site the last few days to provide food and water and restore public safety?
When residents interviewed on FAUX news express any of these frustrations and try to relate them to the buck stopping at the president's locale? The "reporter" cuts them off!
Thursday, September 1

Umbra told a fart joke, hehey.
by
amazngdrx
on Thu 01 Sep 2005 08:30 AM CDT
http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2005/8/31/124732/191#1
Good one Umbra!
But seriously, imagine this of you will?
A fossil fuel powerplant emitting all it's air pollution into algae growing solar cogeneration facilities with collectors mounted on the powerplant buildings and smokestacks.
The CO2, mercury, and NOx are removed from the water by the algae. The algae, with solar energy added, is turned into biofuel, methane for instance, and the mercury is filtered out of the methane digestor.
The methane (poot)is then burned in the powerplant, saving coal combustion, and the CO2 from the methane combustion is sent back through the solar cogeneration facility to make more biofuel.
The CO2 becomes a part of a closed loop. And sequestration is acomplished, eureka! Maybe those green tags could fund some of this activity?

Trillions lost in terms of economic growth?
by
amazngdrx
on Thu 01 Sep 2005 07:15 AM CDT
http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2005/8/31/95831/5608#6
So far no one has pointed this out. The fact that moving and rebuilding whole cities like New Orleans will cost unimaginable amounts of money, but also the lost business may even surpass that!
How much economic growth is curtailed when whole cities are wiped out?
No jobs, no money earned, no mortgages payed, no stores shopped at, no factories operating... and so forth.
This is why global climate disaster from fossil fuel combustion will cost 100s of trillions in economic growth over the next century.
Is Manhattan, or any other city, prepared for devestation like New Orleans has experienced? Of course not! Even if it were possible to plan for it somehow, would a totally corrupt bottomline, corporatist serving, lobbyist run system like the US has become do that?
Not on your, and millions of your fellow citizens lives. Just as there is no homeland security, it was a sham to loot the federal treasury,there are not even any substantial evacuation plans, much less any recovery plans.
And with completely unregulated insider trading and market manipulation run rampant could gas hit 5 dollars tomorow or next week? Yep.
Tuesday, August 30

Utility coops and wireless broadband information technology.
by
amazngdrx
on Tue 30 Aug 2005 09:20 AM CDT
http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2005/8/25/162752/682#9
I envision renewable energy cooperatives that will also use wind electric towers to supply their customers with wimax wireless broadband. That can take care of cable tv, radio, phone, internet...as well as power needs for coop members.
All bundled into one low cost structure.
Then power consuming coop members will pay power producing coop members who have wind, solar, and biofuel installations..or in the case of internet access, those members paying for landline internet access that take it wireless on their wind towers will be paid by members using the coop's wireless broadband network.
This scheme cuts most of the old line utility monopoly participation right out of the loop. We still use their powrer lines and internet lines to some extent, but very minimally. Eventually capital will acumulate in the cooperative utility company and the old utility's lines and powerplants can be bought out lock, stock, and barrel.
Voila! A local, homegrown energy re-evolution!
Add in micro-nedia replacement of mass delusional, mass media....and we may even be able to rejuvenate our lost democracy.
Too ambitious? Hehehey. It will take plenty of grass roots political power as well, to overcome government regulations favoring old line monopolies.

Gristmill discussion on wireless information technology versus land lines.
by
amazngdrx
on Tue 30 Aug 2005 08:42 AM CDT
http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2005/8/25/162752/682#8
Well digging in all those phone (or cable tv) lines does cause a lot of disruption of flora and fauna. And it creates monopolies that control information access.
As far as amount of radiation and bird killing towers, replacing all those extremely powerful analog broadcast towers for radio, tv, cell phones,all the radio dispatch sevices...with extremely low powered wimax systems mounted on existing buildings fed by fiber optics, it's clear which system wins from an environmental standard.
The public air waves are filled to the brim right now with all kinds of powerful junk signals that many of us never bother to receive. A more selective wireless broadband system would only supply signal on demand.
For instance,instead of 360 kw of tv signal beamed out over a huge area from each tv station, that signal would be transported digitally on the wireless network, only to those who request it.
I am talking about a new wireless information technology built out on the net and extended using wimax. It would bring the very latest education, news, entertainment even to the remotest regions.
And reduce the human produced electronmagnetic radiation by magnitudes. Not to mention, make all those broadcast towers candidates for recycling.
Monday, August 29

A bet over the price of oil in 2010, over or under 200 bucks per barrel?
by
amazngdrx
on Mon 29 Aug 2005 07:09 AM CDT
http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2005/8/23/44458/4074#5
There's a commodity futures market for oil that takes bets 'round the world 'round the clock..
Which brings up a conundrum. What is the REAL price of oil? Is it measured by the price that consumers pay for fuel? Where? In europe, the US, Venezuala, Iraq?
Is it measured in the blood spilled over it's control?
Or in the global climate disaster it's combustion is bringing about?
Or in the cost of bringing alternative transportation energy economies to life?
How about measuring it in terms of the destruction of the standard of living of families everywhere as energy prices soar? Homes lost to fuel expenses for heating, electricity, and transportation.
Sunday, August 28

Organic food discussion continued on Gristmill.
by
amazngdrx
on Sun 28 Aug 2005 11:00 AM CDT
http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2005/8/25/12228/0949#12
I am advocating plugin electric equipment actually, to replace oil powered machinery.
The thing about inexpensive labor from the underdeveloped nations of spaceship earth is that it is being exploited to produce the same old genetically engineered, big agri biz, chem oil toxic,tasteless food.
Because of the long shipment from these countries to the big consumer markets the produce is designed to be picked green and hardly ever really ripens, mainly it rots.
The main advantage of robotic assistance to growers is that real heirloom crops with great taste and nutrition can be grown to peak and harvested and transported quickly, all without the labor costs asociated with selective weeding, watering, feeding, and harvesting.
Crop rotation in strips and natural pest repellant plants can substitute for chemical toxins. Hand weeding and mulching, necessary without the use of chemical toxins, can be done quickly and productively with renewable electric powered machines that crawl between the rows.
And organic fertilizer made from waste can substitute for oil based and mined fertilizer
Saturday, August 27

Fossil plants revved down as wind and solar revs up?
by
amazngdrx
on Sat 27 Aug 2005 10:33 AM CDT
This could create a very interesting partnership, with each fossil plant having corresponding onsite and other grid location solar and wind sites adding energy into a balanced system.
Cleanup and filtration of the liquid effluent from coal power plant smoke scrubbers could be done with surplus wind and solar power that the electrical grid would normally reject.
A symbiotic system of wind, solar, and fossil generation, with renewable energy used to clean the coal plant pollution. All CO2 and NO emmissions absorbed by algae. The algae then turned into biofuel, with mercury and other toxins removed.
It's economically feasible with wind and solar.
And end to most pollution from fossil fuel while still burning it? Not quite, there's still oil to contend with. But a step in the right direction!

(P?)resident Bush, hard at work?
by
amazngdrx
on Sat 27 Aug 2005 08:28 AM CDT
It's hard..hard work.. eating pretzels (without choking), riding his bike (without crashing).
But relax..he thinks about the war everyday...every single day.
Bankrupting the US government and the US economy, exporting manufacturing jobs offshore, continuing a murderous war over oil that is sinking deeper and deeper into mega-vietnam war like status... it's all hard...hard work...hard to keep from pretzel choking bike crashes whilst doing that very hard work.
HARD?! One would think it would be almost impossible to engineer the drop of the vibrant 90s US economy and world super powerdome into the hole that duuuhbya has taken US into.
But duuuhbya and his neorats have done it. Nice voting bushco inc sheople..just say duuuuhbya!

A culture of systematic boredome from cradle to grave.
by
amazngdrx
on Sat 27 Aug 2005 07:59 AM CDT
A mass delusional culture based on the premise that quantity of consumption and possesions directly relates to human happiness and fullfillment creates a systematic boredome.
Children who are disturbed by this warehouse training of cannon fodder and cheap labor for the all hat, no cattle duuuhbyaist regime ranch, are then diagnosed as mentally defective and addicted to speed (ritalin).
Real quality of life, creativity and inspiration amongst and from all to and from each individual human is the cure. Low brain function or simply rebellious boredome?
Even duuuhbya himself is bored by it all. He's just another puppet on a neoconman corporatist string.

another excellent Gristmill discussion on the higher cost of organic food.
by
amazngdrx
on Sat 27 Aug 2005 07:28 AM CDT
http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2005/8/25/12228/0949#9
Basically the difference between organic and chemical farming is in the soil. Organic has soil with natural micro-organisms producing what the plants need continuously in symbiosis with the whole living system.
This makes for healthier, better tasting, more nutritious vegetables. It also makes weeds grow very well.
In chemical farming the crops are designed to be resistant to poisons applied to kill everything (insects and other plants)except the crops themselves. The soil is dead, nothing but a semi-sterile chemical hydroponic media supplied with nutrients by oil based and mined fertilizers.
These poisons persist in the food,water, and air, atrazine for example lowers the sperm count of human males living in corn country unable to swim. The chemical companies response to this? They are no doubt developing a male birth control pill based on atrazine.
Organic farming relies on human labor to physically separate weeds and bugs from the crops, eschewing the use of poisons and crops designed to resist those poisons. Food is produced from a natural, oraganic living system.
But that human labor makes organic food inherently more expensive.
The way to reduce labor costs asociated with organic farming? Machines. Smart machines taught to do the repetitive labor of planting, weeding, mulching, watering, fertilizing, harvesting...by human gardeners.
Friday, August 26

my mother, who will outlive me, stands fast
by
amazngdrx
on Fri 26 Aug 2005 05:27 AM CDT
my mother, who will outlive me, stands fast
my mother, who will outlive me, stands fast, shrouded in grief’s fine dust. who can console my courageous mother? dead hand of the past, smug with indifference; blind faith extols babylon’s towering plans, now collapsed. you anesthetize minds with vitriol, as spurious power slips from your grasp. heaven’s forgiveness will not save your soul from a mother’s rage, a rage whose dolor dwarfs your noble cause: the future you stole to satiate your cowardly bipolar bloodlust for omnipotent control. lurk behind your narcissist’s walls of glass: my mother, who outlived me, still stands fast.
http://www.poetsagainstthewar.org/displaypoem.asp?AuthorID=24826
(A poem inspired by Cindy Sheehan's remarkable efforts, reprinted here with the author's permission)
Thursday, August 25

Hyperlinked to peace?
by
amazngdrx
on Thu 25 Aug 2005 08:21 AM CDT
Combine this , this , and this , ...and we could get to THIS?
Replacement of all oil imported from the middle east and an end to oil wars.
Oil is a commodity, easily replaced.
Lives of those lost in oil wars are NOT COMMODITIES! Those loved ones are irreplaceable to their families, friends, and citizens who mourn the loss of lives of US soldiers and middle eastern non-combatants, especially the defenseless women and children.

A great dialectic on electric bikes on Gristmill! Human imagination spurred by bio-d's real life creation!
by
amazngdrx
on Thu 25 Aug 2005 08:00 AM CDT
"Another electric option"
http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2005/8/23/9347/79719
Well an electric plugin motorcycle of course.
With human power assist...
The problem with bicycles and motorcycles is safety. So a combination with a plugin electric drivetrain plus a generator powered by arms and legs of the rider(s) that encloses them in a kevlar epoxy shell with roll cage would be a nice combination.
And for more carrying space? An expandable wheel base. The body telescops out to carry an extra passenger, gear, groceries.
For hay bales or building materials? A community electric hybrid truck borrowed from your local green energy coop.

Green energy cooperatives? A thought experiment in progress.
by
amazngdrx
on Thu 25 Aug 2005 07:32 AM CDT
Green energy coop? An institution that uses (and lobbys for more) rules compelling power companies to use net metering in order to pool say 5 coop members that do not have solar and wind power installations with each one that does (that has the capacity to power 6 homes, for instance), in order to use net metering amongst all those coop members to provide them all free power.
How would this be funded? By selling shares in the coop plus selling green energy credits. The coop can sell them to the public directly, and in some states like New Jersey sell the pollution credits on the open market like this guy sold them.
The coop members would get low interest loans (from the coop) to install solar and wind at wholesale prices by coop affiliated contractors in return for assigning their pollution credits for sale by the coop.
Then the coop would extend into leasing electric hybrid vehicles to members (on a few hours or days basis) and providing the green power, electricity and biofuel needed to power them.
Coop members who did not have wind, solar, or biofuel installations would pay a lower than usual rate for the coop services in return for membership. Any profits from the venture would be divided amongst the shareholders to defray power costs for non-generating members, or for generating members to pay down their loans for their equipment.
The number of shares bought by each member could correspond to their power needs. Thus a single family would need fewer shares than a small business or farm.
Wednesday, August 24

5 minute charge, 75 mile range electric vehicle road testing in Japan. Detroit will soon be a hasbeen auto manufacturing capitol.
by
amazngdrx
on Wed 24 Aug 2005 07:23 AM CDT
http://www.worldchanging.com/archives/003339.html
Fuji Heavy Industries, the maker of Subaru brand vehicles, announced that it will release the R1e electric minicar by 2010, and that the vehicle will begin roadtests in Japan this year.
Based on the R1 minicar, the R1e uses a lithium-ion battery can be recharged to 90% of capacity in five minutes. The current prototype can be driven 120 kilometers (75 miles) without recharging, but the distance is expected to be expanded to 200 kilometers (124 miles). Fuji Heavy plans to start testing the R1e on public roads this year. The company also unveiled a new capacitor with quadruple the energy density of earlier models. (GCC)
Compare this and other electric car news from Asia with the bushco inc. 21 mpg CAFE standard by 2012. Is big oil running the US or are the representatives of the best interests of we the people?
No doubt about it, Japanese auto makers will soon flood the US with these electric vehicles manufactured in China and all those US auto worker's jobs and pensions will be gone.
Is that aok with bushco inc. voters? Apparently so?
Monday, August 22

Just replace middle east oil! Eureka an end to oil war.
by
amazngdrx
on Mon 22 Aug 2005 10:39 AM CDT
The crux of the matter of oil wars is replacing fuel from the middle east. Canadian, Norwegian, even Venezualen fuel is not coming from war zones.
Biodiesel may not replace even all of that fuel, but does it have to? Nope.
As I point out here..
Going towards plugin vehicles powered by solar and wind electricty, thus reducing our need for oil for transportation to a very small percentage of what it now is.
Then biofuels..all taken together, produced from crop, food, animal, and human waste, and lately here in wisconsin the wood sugars from the paper making process...ethanol, biodiesel, methanol, methane, hydrogen (produced using renewable energy), will be enough to at least dispense with imported oil that fuels these continuous oil wars.
My take on wars for oily empire is that they are really driven by the big multinational monopoly oil companies and the politicians, like President Bush and Tony Blair, that serve them.
This is why eliminating imported oil is opposed by these polticians. As the need for imported oil dried up, so would the motivation behind oil wars.
Multinational oil compnies could not sponsor their own oil wars minus a friedly government that is willing to bakrupt itself in the process, like the US government is.
These ongoing oil wars, were they pay as we go, would add a 1 dollar per gallon tax to each gallon of motor and heating fuel! If exxon mob had to pay for these wars? No corporate profits!! Yikes.
let's go to renewables and put exxon mob (and oil warring corporations like Halliburton)and the rest out of bidness.
Thursday, August 18

Best answer EVER on objections to biodiesel from agrim-chem farming!!
by
amazngdrx
on Thu 18 Aug 2005 10:51 AM CDT
http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2005/8/15/123928/865#4
Best answer ever Rob! You rock! I have been hoping that question could be answered that effectively!
Do you have links to the 3.2 to 1 figure? I could use them on my blog.
This new blog article may provide a useful aproach also?
http://amazngdrx.myblogsite.com/blog/_archives/2005/8/18/1149152.html
Another way to go Rob is to advocate that seed oil crops be grown using organic fertilizer recycled from waste using renewable energy and farmed with battery electric tractors plugged into wind or solar.
I believe that seed oil crops like rapeseed and canola grow really well on marginal northern great plains farmland where wind power would also be better installed away from masses of human habitation.
That comment about biodiesel as a byproduct rather than a main product is brilliant too Rob! Excellent job!!!

Comment on an article by the always wonderful (sigh) green superhero babe Umbra Fisk.
by
amazngdrx
on Thu 18 Aug 2005 10:35 AM CDT
http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2005/8/17/124039/902
Yep Umbra! Good advice, a biodiesel cooperative in someone's garage is the way to go. Even if it's only extended family size. I have seen it work here!
What I really like though is a plugin electric car with a biodiesel powered generator as a backup. The beauty of this is that a wind or solar system can charge your car for regular commutes, then the biodiesel can power longer trips.
The amount of biodiesel used then would tend to match the waste vegetable oil resource.
Anti biodieselers generally point out (rightly so) that the only green source of biodiesel is recycled cooking oil (agri-chem farming is far from green, dependent upon oil)and that this source can only provide a small fraction of fuel needs.
Well no problem then, reduce fuel needs to match waste veggie oil supply by mainly using wind and solar electric power for most driving.
Wednesday, August 17

Body armor still missing in action after 3 years of oil war in Iraq.
by
amazngdrx
on Wed 17 Aug 2005 08:21 AM CDT
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/08/14/international/middleeast/14armor.html
Us troops still without proper body armor in Iraq? Yep.
Impeach the bushco inc. administration. This is way worse than a "lewinsky" in the oval office.
Friday, August 12

Water is the oil of this century.
by
amazngdrx
on Fri 12 Aug 2005 08:39 AM CDT
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/08/12/national/12water.html
Now that composting toilets are legal here in Wisconsin, will water short exurbs like Waukesha use them? Or will they instead slant drill the great lakes dry?
Will technology that mixes compressed air with water to clean clothes, people, and dishes be adopted in time? It can save over half the water normally used for those purposes, and use less soap doing it. Making waste water treatment and recycling a lot easier.
Here it might happen, and show the way out of the global water crisis. Wisconsin manufacrurers need to get on this immediately, if not sooner! Revive old bucky Fuller patents and just do it!
And Wisconsin government better get out in front of this effort. Show the rest of the US how it's done Wisconsin!
Wednesday, August 10

Bomb tonnage compared.
by
amazngdrx
on Wed 10 Aug 2005 01:41 PM CDT
War Tonnage Length Tonnage/Month WW II 2,150,000 45 months 47,777.78 Korea 454,000 37 months 12,270.27 Vietnam/SEA 6,162,000 140 months 44,014.29 Gulf War 60,624 1.5 months 40,416.00
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/ops/desert_storm.htm
I haven't found stats for Iraq yet.

Food wins over bombs! 10 to 1 on cost!
by
amazngdrx
on Wed 10 Aug 2005 01:34 PM CDT
Well preliminary estimates are in and food turns out to be 1/10nth the price of bombs.
http://usmilitary.about.com/od/weapons/l/aabombs3.htm
Bombs come in at 10 dollars per pound or much much much more!
Flour, corn meal, milk powder, soy protien in bulk of course. What a government surplus program would buy them for comes in around 1 dollar per pound. So figuring one pound per day per person as a basic ration.
The 20,000 pounds of food dropped equivalent in cost to only one 2000 pound bomb would keep 500 people going for 40 days!!
Anyone know how many tons of bombs were dropped on Iraq so far?
Tuesday, August 9

WMDs in iraq? Well of course none were found because they weren't there.
by
amazngdrx
on Tue 09 Aug 2005 10:20 AM CDT
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2-1726745,00.html
But they were there in the 80's, and this genetic tracking of the anthrax Saddam had before Gulf War 1 proves where they came from. DNA evidence proves it.
Biological warfare experiments by the US using anthrax taken from the UK bio-weapons effort
The Reagan/Bush administration is the source of Saddam's anthrax, positive genetic proof exists.
Has the statute of limitations run out on this criminal activity by the Reagan regime? I doubt it. So why aren't these Reagan officials being investigated for indictment? Does anyone remember Rummi meeting with Saddam? Pictures were taken and are still around of that meeting in the 80s.
I guess it does not "rise to the level" eyyh bushco inc sheople?

GM imbecile execs make the man who pioneered a $5000 43 mpg minivan resign?!?
by
amazngdrx
on Tue 09 Aug 2005 01:06 AM CDT
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/08/09/automobiles/09mini.html?hp&ex=1123646400&en=39dec4f0be9f3532&ei=5094&partner=homepage
Are there any more moronic, imbecilic executives in corporate boardrooms anywhere than these guys who made the fellow that lead the GM effort in china to produce these 43 mpg $5000 minivans...RESIGN??!!!
Instead he should have been made CEO!!
GM stockholders, workers, public pension funds, mutual funds should ALL call for the removal of these idiots who have moved GM bonds to junk status.
This level of corruption and incompetence is truly astounding. The solution to the oil crisis is here now and GM won't let it be sold here? Is there any doubt that big oil runs the US automakers now?
Monday, August 8

Re: "The Good News Bears" by By JOHN TIERNEY in The New York Times.
by
amazngdrx
on Mon 08 Aug 2005 07:23 AM CDT
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/08/06/opinion/06tierney.html?ex=1280980800&en=ece16163d5ad8440&ei=5090&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss
amazingdrx - 8:18 AM ET August 8, 2005 (#2874 of 2874)
This column deserves as much critical thought as...
This anecdote: "Once the Arctic ice is gone, oil tankers will have a shorter path to travel. And that will save oil!!"
These neos (conservative, liberal, and libertarian)are intellectual throwbacks to sophism, and that is painting their nonsense in it's best light.
In the second half of the 5th century B.C., and especially at Athens, "sophist" came to be applied to a group of thinkers who employed debate and rhetoric to teach and disseminate their ideas and offered to teach these skills to others. Due to the importance of such skills in the litigious social life of Athens, acclaimed teachers of such skills often commanded very high fees. The practice of taking fees, coupled with the willingness of many practitioners to use their rhetorical skills to pursue unjust lawsuits, eventually led to a decline in respect for practitioners of this form of teaching and the ideas and writings associated with it.
http://encyclopedia.laborlawtalk.com/Sophist

(Un)inteligent design..of faithbased cannon fodder and cheap labor. More chattel on the all hat no cattle duuuhbyaist ranch.
by
amazngdrx
on Mon 08 Aug 2005 06:00 AM CDT
http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2005/8/7/121734/2911
Call and response from the moveon forum....answered this question without the faux Menckenisms of beltway big shot think tankery.
The call for theocratic "edjeeekashun"...
http://www.actionforum.com/forum/scores.html?&comment_id=254677
And the response..
119. Your mode of reasoning Cynthia.
Survival of the fittest? Your flawed powers of logic make for an evolutionary dead end.
American workers educated in southern christian academies are finding that out about now. New Japanese auto factories are going to Canada for highly skilled workers and low cost production to compete with China, instead of previous locations in the southern US.
Faith based education tends to create a mind set opposed to science and technolgy. Inovation thrives where reason and the scientific method are the core of public education. Withdrawal of government support for public education in favor of religious private schools in those regions is to blame.
The US cannot compete on a global economic and (thus) a military stage with China, India, Japan...and on and on..
..with faithbased christian acdemy education. Public education relying on the finest current scientific knowledge base is necessary. Without it we the people are economic toast, and the US is a soon to be has been super power like the UK is now.
Friday, August 5

A very long discussion on wind power on Gristmill blog..continued..
by
amazngdrx
on Fri 05 Aug 2005 01:23 PM CDT
http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2005/7/18/1459/58709#51
Mountain wildreness siting may not be best?
I would favor installations on marginal farmland on the northern great plains to mountain wilderness habitat.
A portion of the revenue from the machine could fund bio-remediation of problems leftover from farming (grazing cattle and monocrop chemical agriculture are incredibly destructive),as well as the compaction of soil, erosion, and habitat disruption caused by the wind installation itself.
And unlike other sources of energy like nuclear, coal, and oil, the temporary disruption from wind power would not turn into the permanent devestation of toxic and radioactive contamination of groundwater, air, lakes, and rivers.
Sound deadening technolgy, both passive and active (systems that cancel noise by emitting sound waves that cancel out the noise) ought to be reseached and considered for every wind installation. Any objectionable level of noise pollution is totally unecessary to efficient wind power conversion.
And think of inexpensive wind power used to power cleanup of radioactive and other toxic waste, pumps and filters running for decades if necessary. Wind power would make that financially possible.

Dropping bombs versus dropping food? Would food be more cost effective?
by
amazngdrx
on Fri 05 Aug 2005 12:33 PM CDT
http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2005/8/3/53622/56643
I am researching a comparison of the cost of dropping bombs versus dropping food. Malthus and Fuller both pointed out that shortage is what makes the four horsemen ride.
Here's a corollary question, would dropping food laced with birth control compounds be ethical or even technically possible? I know this is done with pidgeons. Where women and children are chattel I fear this comparison is disgustingly apt.
Would it be seen as demeaning by progressives and evildoing by fundamentalists were it applied to human overpopulation?
It seems to me that massive quantities of food air dropped, without invasion, occupation, and nation building might save a region from disastrous genocide and disease temporarily.
And birth control might save it permanently. Hopefully voluntarily used by women who have reclaimed their reproductive rights from oppressive patriarchal theocracies.
Maybe the concept of war of intervention itself ought to be re-thought. Wasn't that what President John F. Kennedy was trying to do with the peace corps?

Will the retirement of aging oil monopolists like this Exxon CEO bring change?
by
amazngdrx
on Fri 05 Aug 2005 09:59 AM CDT
http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2005/8/4/145751/7934
Microcap companies like this will most likely lead the way to the future, while the big old monstrous oil monopoly corporations, like Exxon are dragged into the future kicking and screaming, collecting every last dime for every last drop of oil they can find
This system does not even use the new Toshiba quick charge lithium battery, which should make it perform much better, on charging, range,low temperature tolerance, and battery life.

George will..won't. Enlighten anyone on creationism versus evolution.
by
amazngdrx
on Fri 05 Aug 2005 01:38 AM CDT
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8358264/site/newsweek/#storyContinued
Will's piece is yet another collection of unrelated misinformation used to pander to fundamentalism while appearing to embrace reason. His schlock in trade.
Creationism is tautological because it is not "falsifiable"? It is like a mathematical theorem a=a, that is true by the nature of the terms used and the rules of logic and therefore contains no useful scientific information?
Sorry George, creationism does not rise even to this low level of rationality. It is also internally inconsistent. Like stating a= not a.
Will is misusing a classic philosophical distinction between the nature of truth, analytic (tautological) truth and synthetic (emprical, scientific) truth to give more credit to creationism than it deserves. Religion is not mathematical in it's use of logic.
(Pythagoras believed that mathematics was THE religion and formed a cult base upon it, but that is just the reverse.)
Just because someone is considered a "prominent" politically correct wing nut celebrity like Will, does not mean he is immune to the rules of logic.
It is (alleged) thinking like this that brought us the sorry spectacle of former POW, war hero Sen. John McCain being lectured by Bill O'Really (sic, very sick)on the efficacy and legality of torture. (Featured on "The Daily show", does anyone actually watch O'Really after the falaffel/loufa incident?)
And George, social darwinism is not Darwinism at all. It is disinformation that ought to be exposed by progressives everywhere, everytime as not only ridiculous, but also racist and fascist.
Thursday, August 4

the Bechtel "free" market solution to supplying water, the oil of this century.
by
amazngdrx
on Thu 04 Aug 2005 08:33 AM CDT
http://www.corpwatch.org/article.php?id=6975
If Bechtel's contract in Iraq is extended to include "distribution of water," just as Halliburton's was for oil, the people of Iraq have much to fear. Bechtel is one of the top-ten water privatization firms in the world. After privatizing the water system in Cochabamba, Bolivia, a subsidiary of Bechtel made water so expensive that many were forced to do without. The government met public protests with deadly police force. Bechtel waited. Finally, the Bolivian government canceled Bechtel's contract. The company responded with a $25 million lawsuit for lost profits.
Of course the solution to every problem resides in privitization and "free" market solutions for the neo-poltocos (be they neo..liberal, conservative, or libertarian).
Government of, by, and for we the people can do nothing right. So turn over control of earth, air, fire, and water to beneficent corporate monopoly power.
That is their idea of "free" markets. Upin which they base their arguments to destroy democracy and replace it with a corportate dictatorship of the proletariat.
A happy, happy, joy, joy state where corporate "citizens" lend their extra special rights to provide a protective shield over citizens who have had their rights taken away from them in order to facilitate absolute corporate power.
But they only protect those who remain loyal serfs in the corporate feudal system. The troublemakers who fight back are met with "deadly force".
Wednesday, August 3

The unfunniness of wing nut "satire". Comment on a Gristmill article.
by
amazngdrx
on Wed 03 Aug 2005 08:49 AM CDT
http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2005/8/2/131352/9621
I think it is an attempt at humor ice?
As with all this kind of humor relying on flawed facts, the fundamental(ist?) fallacies kill the joke.
Not funny, just pathetic. Like Dennis Miller has become, for instance. Or "South Park".
Wing nut political correctness is no laughing matter it would seem? The deaths caused by continuous energy war always loom in the background of their alleged satire.
Oh saw a great feature on your hydrogen efforts on PBS here last night. And the Oshinksy's metal hydride hydrogen storage system. It looks very promising!!
I still REALLY like those Toshiba quick charge batteries though as an alternative. They would charge up with your abundant geothermal electric power too. But maybe for your fishing fleet hydrogen would be better.
Monday, August 1

Organic food "elitist"? Or is it just too expensive because of a lack of research and inovation?
by
amazngdrx
on Mon 01 Aug 2005 01:01 AM CDT
http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2005/7/22/16354/4347
I am proposing that research dollars be devoted to this effort shifting from chemically based agriculture.
I am arguing that organic production of food could match the productivity of chemically based agriculture using these technological advantages and that would raise the supply of organic food and lower it's cost to consumers.
That competition in the cost arena would in turn eliminate the "elite" label that some place upon it. Although I do not feel this eliteism critique is realistic. I think it is just another way to denigrate organic agriculture for political purposes.
Publicly supported universties and university extension programs ought to work with engineering and computer research deparments to get this done.
Continuing on the course of stronger and stronger chemical pestices, herbicides, and fertilizers, genetically altered organisms, and mono-culture is self defeating.
It destroys natural organisms in the soil that rebuild it, kills the predators of harmful insects, and actually makes the weeds and insects targeted by the chemicals ever stronger by this inatural form of natural selection. Roaches shall inherit the earth!
Labor saving, productivity enhancing, robot garden equipment, wind and solar electric powered that is guided by expert human gardeners can make organic food production surpass chemical agriculture.
Think how great it will be to eat fantastically tasting and healthy food everyday that people can afford. The percentage of vegetarians would rise exponentially, obesity and heart disease would decrease.
I would live on tomatos myself, if I could get really good ones all the time.
I think cancer rates would also fall rapidly.
Saturday, July 30

New York Times forum discussion on Space Shuttle safety, resumed after a few years.
by
amazngdrx
on Sat 30 Jul 2005 01:37 PM CDT
http://forums.nytimes.com/top/opinion/readersopinions/forums/science/spaceandthecosmos/index.html?offset=19614&fid=.f2e4e3c/19614
Well well, here we are discussing the space shuttle again.
Remember all the solutions discussed here after the accident?
One was followed, careful photographic examination of the launch to catch any problems.
But apparently the other suggestion to add fiber to the foam (kevlar of course would be the choice), was not followed.
In fact this was the case!
Among other things, it improved the training processes for applying foam by hand. At the Michoud tank assembly plant in Louisiana, an observer monitors every worker spraying foam - "for every sprayer there's a watcher, a second pair of eyes," said June Malone, a NASA spokeswoman.
But the tank that flew with the Discovery last week was made before the new procedures went into effect, and NASA stopped short of requiring that the ramps be redone, said a spokesman, Martin J. Jensen.
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/07/31/science/space/3 [...]
So NO improvement at all was done to the foam!! They flew with tank insulation applied before the new procedure "... improved the training processes for applying foam by hand", identical to the foam that killed the previous crew? Why?
"Foam really is complicated," said Douglas D. Osheroff, a professor of physics at Stanford and a member of the board that investigated the Columbia accident. "Once you go supersonic, the top surface melts, the bottom surface is brittle as all hell because it's very cold, and you've got everything in between."
Although the material could be made less fragile by adding fibers to the foam, he noted, "that adds weight" to the shuttle.
So the weight argument trumped the safety issue? Why not save weight in other areas?
And finally this.
"I think they tried to find the solution within their own ranks, using what they're already familiar with," he said. "They should have looked at more options," perhaps including different formulations of foam that might be more flexible. But that would go against a fundamental tenet of engineering. As Michael D. Griffin, NASA's new administrator and an engineer himself, said Friday, engineers believe "If it ain't broke, don't fix it."
"We debated and discussed whether the PAL ramp was broke" in the months that followed the Columbia disaster, Dr. Griffin continued. "The conclusion we came to was the wrong one, but the conclusion we came to after considerable study was that it was better to fly as is."
"If it ain't broke, don't fix it." But the ramp was not "broke", the foam coating was "broke".
And it was not fixed, or tested until failure as is the rule with aircraft engineering.
The people who made the decision not to fix the foam and test it need to be retired with extreme prejudice. And replaced by folks like this..
A NASA engineer who works on tank safety issues said other areas of foam shedding from the Discovery's tank were even more troubling than the PAL ramp loss - especially a divot that popped from the vicinity of the left-hand bipod strut, the spot that shed the foam that brought down Columbia.
"We worked the hell out of that," said the engineer, who was given anonymity because he said disclosure of his name would jeopardize his career. The loss of foam from that spot after so much work to correct the problem, he went on, proves that the problem is still far more complex than NASA understands.
Another potential whistleblower that had to remain silent to protect his career. When will reform take hold? Will it ever?
This is the same story at every level of our culture. Remain silent or face mob justice.

An author from The Cato Institute and Grist magazine are so threatened by drx's comments they want him banned?
by
amazngdrx
on Sat 30 Jul 2005 02:37 AM CDT
http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2005/7/29/14457/5441
Evidently this is so. I received this email from moderators at Gristmill, the lightly visited blog of Grist online magazine.
amazingdrx,
We have received several complaints about your participation in the comment boards on Gristmill, both from other readers and from guest authors. Though the complaints cover a variety of subjects, the main two are as follows:
1. You frequently issue ad hominem attacks, questioning the motives and character of other readers and authors. 2. You simply comment too much. Readers have complained that you "overwhelm" the site and "crowd out other voices." They have said that they believe the frequency of your comments makes other readers hesitant to comment and reduces the diversity and vibrancy of the comment boards.
Please take steps to address these behaviors.
This will be your only warning. If we receive further complaints, we will be forced to ban you from further participation on Gristmill.
--Gristmill admin.
I would think they would be grateful for ANY participation given that most topics introduced engender no comments from anyone? Maybe this venue is best left to the "authors" to comment on each other's entries? Hehehey.
Mob rule is the rule on the internet given this brand of moderation. I have seen it for years.
Political correctness must be followed to remain popular with very sensitive netizens whose sudden power goes to their heads.

These provisons of The Apollo Energy Plan seem very weak.
by
amazngdrx
on Sat 30 Jul 2005 02:08 AM CDT
http://gristmill.grist.org/comments/2005/5/18/132254/932/4#4
-Requires the federal government to purchase 10% of its electricity from renewable sources, such as solar and wind power, or other zero-emission sources by 2015.
-Require that when the federal government purchases vehicles, 10% of those vehicles must be hybrids or vehicles that otherwise achieve 40 miles per gallon.
-Provides interest free loans so that institutions of higher learning, municipalities and local governments can purchase hybrids or vehicles that can get 40 miles to the gallon.
-Require the government to, where it is economically feasible, purchase biodiesel, 85% ethanol blended gasoline, or 10% ethanol blended gasoline.
- The bill will also provide tax credits in order to incentivize consumer purchase of and industry production of hybrids, advanced diesels, alternative fuel and hydrogen vehicles.
____________________________________________
Since 40 mpg vehicles are already available for purchase right now and this plan propses only 10% government purchase by 2015, it is very hard to see how this would free the US from dependence on foreign oil.
Many corporate energy industry experts and government officials already believe nuclear power to be zero emmission, and this plan only requires 10% purchase of zero emmission energy by 2015.
It just does not seem to be an effective plan for eliminating reliance on foreign oil and reducing greenhouse gas emmissions to halt global climate disaster.
|
iieo@hotmail.com
This Month
| November 2005 |
| Sun |
Mon |
Tue |
Wed |
Thu |
Fri |
Sat |
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|