Once again the lies of these perpetual neoconman liars are catching up to one another.

Blair is being criticized now for going to war in Iraq on the grounds that it brought on the London bombing.

So Blair says, those critics are using the same reasoning as terrorist groups who link the London bombing as a justifiable response to the Iraq invasion. In effect calling his critics terrorist sympathizers? Yep, the old duuuhbyaist regime tactic.

But who linked Iraq, fraudulently according to the Downing Street memos and the obvious lack of WMDs found in Iraq, to 911? Why the Bush and Blair administrations did that! As an excuse to invade Iraq, instead of pursuing Bin Laden into Pakistan.

Coincidentally (!?!) where al qada trained and sent out the London bombers from.

And who now claims that Iraq and terrorism are inextricably linked? Now that they have the brilliant Bush "bring 'em on" strategery in Iraq. Why these same war mongers for oil based on lies.

Those who point out the obvious fact that the war in Iraq based on fraud has precipitated the London bombing are now terrorist sympathizing traitors?

There truly is no limit to the elitest lying of these people, looking down on the public as gullible sheople to be fooled over and over again with no consequences to their depraved dreams of oily empire.