|
|
Tuesday, December 26

Victory! Audubon endorses wind power!!
by
amazngdrx
on Tue 26 Dec 2006 09:11 AM CST
http://thefraserdomain.typepad.com/energy/2006/12/audubon_society.html#comment-26959488
We win! Game over dood!
And this seals the deal! 95% of our power from wind? Yep.
http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2006/12/17/212637/60
With almost no backup power! It's due to the fact that the wind is always blowing somewhere. Nature's own design, creative chaos! Go with the flow. Wind wins hands down for clean, cheap, easy to use power.
Backed up with water power that harvests power all the way down a river with no dams, no propellers. Stay tuned!! (more on this as it develops...)
Friday, December 22

Plugin/fuel cell vehicle to grid backup for solar, wind, and water power.
by
amazngdrx
on Fri 22 Dec 2006 01:26 AM CST
This makes regular power plants unecessary and obsolete, solving the intermittency problem with wind, water, and solar power.
http://thefraserdomain.typepad.com/energy/2006/12/westinghouse_wi.html#comment-26871562
But are biogas resources too small to backup wind, solar, and water power? yep, most likely they are, but not because digestion loses energy. Manure and farm waste alone would supply a large percentage of backup biogas. Especially when the biogas is used at 75% efficiency.
Where does the rest of the biofuel come from so that natural gas is conserved as long as possible?
From algae in solar collectors. Half of the dry weight of the algae is biodiesel, the other half is cellulose powder. The biodiesel could power the fuel cell vehicles in driving mode, the powdered cellulose, biogas (with natural gas as a backup fuel) in stationery V2G mode.
In v2G the CO2 could be sequestered in the algae system.
The energy lost in bacterial conversion of coal and oil to natural gas would be less than the energy expended in conventional mining and refining. and all that toxic mess that comes with coal and oil would stay far underground where it is already. The natural gas would carry the energy in the coal and oil to the fuel cells.
Yep nukes are all TOO real Dem! Too bad for all of us.
Fuel cost? Biogas in a fuel cell/turbine is around 5 cents per kwh, powdered cellulose from algae is even cheaper. Biodiesel from algae will be cheaper than diesel or biodiesel from fuel farming.
In plugin/fuel cell cars that use 1/10nth of the fuel on average of an equivalent ICE car, biodiesel from algae can provide more than enough liquid fuel for transportation needs.
Manure and waste to biogas. Biogas to electricity and cO2. CO2 to algae biofuel. Biofuel to electricity and cO2. CO2 back to biofuel. It's a cycle.
While it is true that if the grid is mainly powered by solar, wind, and wave power the whole capacity of the grid may need to ocasionally come from a backup source. V2G does that with no duplication of generating capacity.
A big argument with renewables is that if you aproach 100% renewable power on the grid, you also need storage and generation capacity that equals that capacity. in other words you would need all the present power plants idling in case the wind, water, and solar power dissapears all at once all over the grid. And that cost of maintaining those plants in that idling state would negate all the savings from renewables.
By using v2G to supply this emergency backup generation that duplication of generating capacity does not take double the capital investment. Because the vehicles are already payed for by consumers for their transportation function. The V2G mode is a free bonus.
Trillions can also be saved by going to this distributed power generation and storage grid design, because it not only dispenses with power plants, but makes hugely expensive grid upgrades unecessary.
Each home with v2G becomes a neighborhood power system that can power that local grid. And it builds out in blocks from there. Also protecting from ever more frequent power outages due to increased storms from global climate change.
The profit potential of a home, small business, or farm that uses biogas digestors, V2G, wind, and solar power all together is enormous. It allows an individual V2G/renewable supplier or local renewable energy cooperative to guarantee a set minimum amount of power to the grid, making renewables just as reliable as advocates claim fossil and nuclear power are.
Thursday, December 7

"breakthrough could lead to (solarPV)systems with an installation cost of only $3 per watt, producing electricity at a cost of 8-10 cents per kilowatt/hour.
by
amazngdrx
on Thu 07 Dec 2006 09:46 AM CST
http://www.semiconductor-today.com/news_items/DEC_06/SPECTR_061206.htm
With concentrating solar that is 40% efficient, verified by the National Renewable Energy Lab (NREL). By collecting heat as well from the same collector, using solar cogeneration, all the heat and electricity for a very energy efficient home could be provided for an initial investment of less than 10k.
Even without tax credits and other subsidy plans that would give a 5 year or less payback period in most regions of the US. Because many states offer incentives the payback would be even quicker. In NJ for instance, the clean energy credits would bring in around 1000 dollars per year.
Wednesday, December 6

Wright brothers, conventional "wisdom", renewable energy inovation.
by
amazngdrx
on Wed 06 Dec 2006 11:22 AM CST
http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2006/12/5/164414/053#2
I have noticed a lot of grasping at so-called credibility in the discussion lately.
This seems to involve pandering to conventional "wisdom" that renewable energy is more expensive and only practical for maybe 20% of our power needs.
The Wright Brothers labored in anonymity for 4 years after they flew, giving up in despair for 2 1/2 years. Why?
Because of conventional wisdom. The New York Times, the army, and all of the media of their time ignored them as crackpots. For four years, until a marginal nature publication wrote a story on them.
This energy revolution is suffering from this same conventional wisdom syndrome. Drop that and your audience will grow. People need to know that modern day "Wrights" have the solutions that will work already.

No Virginia, do not buy buggy whip stock shares!
by
amazngdrx
on Wed 06 Dec 2006 10:35 AM CST
100 million electric cars with 20kw fuel cell/microturbine backup generators have the capacity to generate over 3 times our present electric power use. All on biogas with natural gas as a backup fuel. With 3 to 5 times present efficiency and 1/10nth the CO2 emmissions.
http://thefraserdomain.typepad.com/energy/2006/12/teacher_saves_t.html#comment-26213019
Sunday, December 3

Science teacher saves 2/3rds of his home electric power use through conservation!
by
amazngdrx
on Sun 03 Dec 2006 11:32 AM CST
Saturday, December 2

ACORE goal too mild, 25% renewable energy by 2025.
by
amazngdrx
on Sat 02 Dec 2006 10:47 AM CST
75% in 10 years, 100% in 20 years.
Along with an increase of conservation reserve cropland and wetlands to reverse GHG concentrations, a 50% increase from the present. Presently 1/3 of our GHG emissions are absorbed by conservation reserve and park land.
http://thefraserdomain.typepad.com/energy/2006/12/acore_conferenc.html#comment-26050525
Monday, November 27

Rooftop solar electric could generate 53% of San Diego county's electric power.
by
amazngdrx
on Mon 27 Nov 2006 10:02 AM CST
I was googling for some estimate of available roof space, space over parking lots, and space over highways suitable for solar power. This study of San Diego county concludes that 53% of electric power could come from solar cells if all available, suitable roof space were used.
Double the assumed efficiency of around 10% for older generation solar cells and supply meets demand. That 20% figure has been reached with several PV designs. And 38% has been reached with 10 sun concentration in concentrating collectors in National Renewable Energy Lab tests.
By using the latest. 55% efficient wide spectrum cells, going into production now, combined with concentration and the added efficiency of heat collection as well, up to 70% could be possible.
And that solar heat can be used for asdsorption cooling for air conditioning as well. Air conditioning is the grid breaking brownout load for electric power. The solar panels also shield roofs from extra sunlight that tends to boost air conditioning load.
Adsorption cooling and direct geothermal ground circulation cooling would reduce air conditioning load on the grid to a tiny perrcentage of current use.
This roof area solar energy estimate is very conservative. It is likely that with technologies in development right now, sunnier areas of the nation like the southwest could produce far more electricity than they use just from solar power mounted on available rooftop and over parking lot space. That is with no use of space over highways at all.
And highways in very hot regions could generate signifigant power from heat energy harvested with tubing running in the road surface that collects that heat to run electric generating turbines running on refrigerant that recondenses by using geothermal cooling.
The southwest can be a net solar power energy exporting region. And almost every region in the uS can at least supply it's needs with solar on roofs and over parking lots. That is even with a huge new power load from electric plugin hybrids.
Concentrating solar cogeneration systems that generate electricity at much higher efficiency than older style flat plate collectors, grow algae that supplies biodiesl fuel, and collect heat energy for heating/cooling; all from the same solar system. With energy conservation from geothermal heating and cooling, plugin hybrid cars, and energy efficient appliances and buildings the world can be powered from rooftops, with no extra land space used.
Friday, November 17

World beating US technology, who will fund it's widespread introduction?
by
amazngdrx
on Fri 17 Nov 2006 07:38 AM CST
I think the CeO2/copper solid oxide fuel cell/turbine generator is going to be the world beater. Multi-fuels from biogas to biodiesel to gasoline to coal to powdered cellulose can power it.
It doesn't foul like other previous fuel cell designs.
It is lightweight, made of ceramic, it can be made to fit anything from a chainsaw to a 747. And get 75% efficiency versus 14% for internal combustion engines.
20% of the fuel for the same mileage/energy output!
A plugin vehicle with even 40 miles worth of quick charge batteries (affordable in terms of weight and cost even now)with one of these as a backup generator would average 10% or less fuel use than a conventional vehicle of the same size and utility.
And this fuel cell/turbine as a grid power backup will run on any fuel. The CO2 from this system used to augment algae/solar biofuel systems will be recycled over and over, effectively sequestering it and reducing total emissions to less than 5% or less of current fossil fueled grid and transportation energy modes.
Then a modest increase in extra conservation reserve land, freed up by a shift in environmental policy (dumping fuel farming to produce ethanol and biodiesel), would be enough to actually reverse anthropomorphic global climate change.
Where, you are asking, does the electricity to recharge plugin vehicles to replace all the oil burned in conventional cars come from? From distributed renewable energy generation and storage.
Solar cogeneration systems on roofs, over parking lots, and highways. Small to medium all the way up to huge wind machines and floating wave/wind power platforms offshore (10 miles, out of NIMBY range). And superconducting energy storage systems to store electric power in regional and local grids.
And distributed storage with 100s of millions of battery powered vehicles and solar/wind power equipped, battery backed up homes and businesses plugged into the grid.
How to pay for it? Cut the tax breaks and other corporate welfare for energy corporations. Make them pay the same tax rate the rest of US pay.
Use half the savings to provide direct tax credits for consumers who buy solar, wind, electric plugin vehicles, and geothermal heat pumps. Pay down the debt built up by these oil wars with the other half of corporate welfare cuts.
Tuesday, November 14

Dams give off methane, CO2 greenhouse gases?
by
amazngdrx
on Tue 14 Nov 2006 09:03 AM CST
Dam alternative!
This is another great reason to modify water power, maybe this way?
http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog/_archives/2005/7/15/...
To restore wetlands, control flood damage, generate clean electric power, restore aquifers, and stop the eco-destruction of regular dams that block fish and wildlife from their natural migration.
By restoring wetlands the carbon sink effect will actually sequester a huge amount of greenhouse gases.
That problem of methane emission from organic matter in silt is due mainly to high nitrogen concentrations in lakes and rivers from agrichem and manure runnoff from farms, lawns, golf courses, and feedlot farming.
The manure can be digested and the methane consumed in fuel cell/turbine generators (75% efficient)to back up the grid that eventually will be mainly supplied with renewable energy. The cO2 recycled through algae solar systems that make more fuel.
The chemical fertilizer can be entrapped out of the watershed by filtering algae from the lake or river into bioreactors that float on the water and produce extra methane to feed the solid oxide fuel cell/turbine generators.
This water bourne algae is a huge energy source, and using it would allow the removal of pollutants along with the algae. Heavy metals can be separated from the bioreactor sediment using renewable energy.
The bioreactor filter would allow everything but the algae to escape digestion into biogas, clean water, and fertilizer.
Saturday, November 11

Sugar cane, extra eco-disaster from agribizz fuel farming.
by
amazngdrx
on Sat 11 Nov 2006 10:28 AM CST
Tuesday, November 7

Abandon your buggy whips nuclear and fossil fuel fans.
by
amazngdrx
on Tue 07 Nov 2006 05:32 AM CST
Reply to nuclear advocates on "The Energy Blog".
http://thefraserdomain.typepad.com/energy/2006/11/vhtr_reactor_pu.html#comment-24989138
Well Brian, you caught me. I'm really hoping the 10 to 20 year delay to prove nuclear power safe and cost effective and able to neutralize it's own waste is a long enough time period for renewables to win.
Thus my compromise proposal.
Wind is already proven safe and cost effective. And that old saw..."We will be lucky to see solar and wind contributing 10% of our power by 2021'..that since renewables are a small part of the energy market now, they can't expand quickly. Well that's pure bunk.
The same kind of bunk that buggy whip manufacturers used to appease their shareholders at the advent of the horseless carriage.
Only 1% of people use horselerss carriages, therefore buggy whip sales will continue to be strong well into the second half of the 20th century!
Equals..
Invest in nuclear and fossil power now!! Renewables are only a tiny portion of the market.
In the case of nuclear it is like the buggy whippers figured they could maybe build carriages the horses ride inside of on treadmills. In order to keep buggy whip sales going. And got billions in corporate welfare (stolen from taxpayers) to develop!
Nuclear fuel, fossil fuel. It's still fuel, with plenty of deadly dangerous pollution, climate disaster producing greenhouse gases, and toxic waste.
Abandon your buggy whips, get onto the renewable power bandwagon, the "horseless carriage" of this energy re-evolution.
Monday, November 6

A vote for the GOP is a vote for "premptive attack on Iran" in the next 2 years.
by
amazngdrx
on Mon 06 Nov 2006 01:06 PM CST
EXTRA!!! READ ALL ABOUT IT!!
Pat Buchanan, arch conservative, on MSNBC supports my wild contention that Bush will attack Iran if congress remains in control of the GOP.
He says that Bill Kristol and the other neoconservative idealogues closely coupled to the vice president's office are pushing for a preemptive attack on Iran and that Bush is for it.
Democrat, republican, green, what have you. Are any of US in favor of invasion, occupation, and nation building (or even bombing) of Iran? 10 dollar gas over night? Panic and disaster in markets and the US and world economy.
All because Bill Kristol needs to "bloster" (bolster with bloviation) his ego after backing the Iraqtastrophe?
Everyone. Vote democrat or vote for invasion of Iran. It truly is that simple this time around.
These neoconservatives running the country and the GOP are not republicans. Republicans are enabling them. We all need to give them the boot into the peanut gallery of history resreved for the nut wing. Out damnable plague of corpoRATS, get thee to a "think" tank. AEI is hiring!
The official US military newspapers all US troops in the middle east read have called for Rummi's dismissal. What does that unprecedented event tell you when the most conservative, the officers in our military, have turned on the neocon nonplan in Iraq?
Let Rummi,this arrogant murderous tortuing old fart, invade Iran? Lets skip that step. Vote democrat across the board this time.
Democrats are democrats, for better or worse, at least we are who we say we are.
These neocons who pretend to be the GOP are not conservatives, republicans, and many aren't even americans (yet?). The main necon liar of the Iraq mess opotamia is Chalabi. An Iraqi.
No doubt Tom Delay's first job as a lobbyist will be to get a special citizenship for Chalabi bill passed just as Iraq goes to Vietnam-consulsate-helicopter-from -the roof mode.
Rumor has it that Kissinger, the genius behind the Vietnam war era bombing of Cambodia, has been secretly advising the running of this war, same result ("peace with honor?!?"), different location. 655,000 dead from this Vietnam war sequel.
Friday, November 3

"why don't people with money and technology make a product that is mass consumable"
by
amazngdrx
on Fri 03 Nov 2006 10:32 AM CST
Thursday, October 26

More corporate board room fiddling as the Earth burns.
by
amazngdrx
on Thu 26 Oct 2006 09:57 AM CDT
Coal gassification or pulverized coal? Neither! Fuel cell/turbine solar collector algae/biogas conversion instead.
http://thefraserdomain.typepad.com/energy/2006/10/pulverized_coal.html#comment-24408921
Monday, October 9

Convert those power plants to solar collector algae/biogas! They produce 4000 gallons of biodiesel per acre too.
by
amazngdrx
on Mon 09 Oct 2006 11:00 AM CDT
Power plant pollution, waste water, and algae all mixed up and pumped through solar collectors, can yield 4000 gallons of biodiesel per acre.
http://thefraserdomain.typepad.com/energy/2006/10/vertigro_algae_.html#comment-23623140
In the case of solid oxide fuel cell/turbine generation that works with biogas from algae the whole system can wean itself from fossil fuels completely. Pulverized coal can be used as long as it is still needed, then biogas from digesting the half of the algae product not turned into biodiesel.
As the area of solar collectors increases the biogas eventually replacing most fossil fuel use as this form of generation becomes mainly a backup for renewable electric grid power from wind, water, and solar. No more combustion, rather fuel cell catalytic conversion at high temperature. Distributed generation and storage backed up by these regional solar algae/biogas energized fuel cell/turbine power plants.
These systems could be mounted on the present power plant buildings. And surrounding buildings. When the sun shines the waste water, algae, and CO 2/ NOx pumped through the tubes in the concentrating solar collectors.
The heat byproduct would provide heating/cooling power for all the buildings the systems are mounted on.
And as long as we're talking fuel for mainly cars, why not mount the remainder of systems needed over parking lots and highways. That way no more undeveloped land need be destroyed to provide this algae based biofuel.
Branson ought to have backed these systems instead of ethanol. Gates screwed up and backed ethanol too. it's alarming.
What we are talking about is an energy re-evolution. Power plants re-evolving into algae/solar power from fossil power, and from combustion to catalytic fuel cell direct electric generation. The coal feeding the fuel cells and CO 2 to the algae until a big enough collector area is built to replace the coal itself with biogas.
And demand for the power plant going lower and lower as renewable sources come online. And when the increasing amount of biogas from the algae meets the decreasing backup power demand? Well then coal becomes an excelent emergency energy source, but is hardly ever needed.
Another possible source of energy for this setup is algae filtered from fertlizer runnoff polluted rivers, lakes, and oceans. why mine coal? Filter algae instead.
Friday, October 6

Nuclear power advocates! Please put up or shut up. thanks.
by
amazngdrx
on Fri 06 Oct 2006 10:30 AM CDT
http://thefraserdomain.typepad.com/energy/2006/10/biofuels_from_h.html#comment-23488923
Why no response from nuclear power advocates to a possible compromise to allow construction of newer, safer, waste eating nuclear power plants?
Because they know that nuclear power could not compete on a subsidy free, level playing field with renewable power.
Wednesday, October 4

Cutting through the nonsense.
by
amazngdrx
on Wed 04 Oct 2006 09:52 AM CDT
http://thefraserdomain.typepad.com/energy/2006/10/biofuels_from_h.html#comment-23375189
This message needs to be on every blog and every media outlet that it can get to. Disaster on every level from our present prevaling energy sources needs to be halted yesterday.
Stop combustion and nuclear fission as energy sources now!
Tuesday, October 3

New religion for new sustainable community values.
by
amazngdrx
on Tue 03 Oct 2006 10:36 AM CDT
http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2006/9/21/233944/840/#27
Time for a new religious institution? Based on the better aspects of other religions with the reverence of nature and it's conservation as the central tenant.
The collection plate is the sale of wind power from systems installed on land put into conservation trust by the community. It could be a global community, with wealthier members donating time and money to bringing simple techology to those in less cash rich locales of spaceship earth. Spiritual tourism, as other religions build homes, clinics, and schools around the world, this community could spread it's renewably powered lifestyle in that helpful, peaceful mode.
Meanwhile the capitalistic members would invest in businesses to manufacture and install these new techologies and produce organic food and renewable power to sell on their own for profit. It's a kind of socialist/religious base, owning the land and power generation wind systems on it, and members as the individual (and partnered) family farms and businesses. Land on the border and interior of conservation land could be sold or leased to members.
Thursday, September 28

Work in progress. Perfect progressive political speech.
by
amazngdrx
on Thu 28 Sep 2006 11:05 AM CDT
What do progressives need in a great ultily grade local, state, and national political speech? Well we are always working on that here in blogland, wether we know it or not.
Even our right winds fiends ...er friends, are helping the dialectic produce it.
We merely need to glean. Glean the perfect speech from the "aether". Calling on the political muse.
Jobs that last, good jobs, based on sustainable renewable energy and next generation techology like solar and wind power and electric plugin vehicles. Jobs in local economies, like farming, logging, manufacturing, recreation, real estate, construction.. that all rest on long term local economic health, instead of short term corporate destruction. Powerful interests corrupting local government and selling resources out cheap for temporay profits and temporay jobs.
An affordable health insurance safety net preventing all these catastopic bankruptcies due to uninured medical disasters, very personal family disasters. Health insurance that lasts so older workers can get jobs, companies are freezing people likely to have uninsured heatlh problems out of hiring, right into financial trouble.
Older baby boomers missing affordable health insurance are at the age where they tend to vote consistently. This issue is vital. My idea would be to lower the medicare age 2 years every year until everyone is covered. But means test medicare so those with over say 200,000 per year income do not get the benefits they don't need, they can afford their own insurance.
Now to reframe all this into bumper sticker slogans! Hehehey.
As the evil, sulfur fuming GOP political consultants say, "we have a bumpersticker, they have an essay."
Their thinks tanks, Heritage foundation, Cato Institute, American enterprise Institure make up those bumperstickers, it's up to us progressive bloggers to get our bumpers stuck.
Let's all challenge our favorite blogs to work this out, dialectically.
Thursday, September 21

Chavez "trifecta"? Duuhbya or devilya?
by
amazngdrx
on Thu 21 Sep 2006 12:44 PM CDT
As I've talked over the original duuhbya "trifecta", and his new "trifecta",
http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2006/9/19/63034/8000/#5
may I now consider Hugo's "trifecta"?
The "sulfur fumes" reference as in he could still smell them at the UN podium after duuhbya's (devilya's) visit.
Satirizing the salem witch trial religious nut wing overtoned axis of evil pronouncements of the duuhbyaist regime.
Satirizing the chimp himself directly. (Judge not, oh yee of shrub-like faithbasedness, hehey)
And of course the oily sufurous fumes of the exxonmob/halliburton minions from hell follow this feller everywhere he goes.
It's Hugo's trifecta joke that beats anything our lame chimp in chief could do, even with decent writers.
Both of these torturing dictators run on oil of course. Who tortures and kills more people? Bush or chavez? That ought to be a topic at their separate but equal trials, that might be held were there actually justice on this planet.
Post script! Hugo controls citgo through Venezualan ownership.
What's next? China owning Walmart?
Then who will buy exxonmob? Iran? Saudi Arabia? Putin's KGB oil mob? Just bidness as usual for the texas oil boy prez.
Nero and bonnie prince duuhbya separated at birth? Hmmmm.

Electric car energy storage for the grid.
by
amazngdrx
on Thu 21 Sep 2006 11:49 AM CDT
http://thefraserdomain.typepad.com/energy/2006/09/prius_phev_will.html#comment-22722444
It looks like the first dawning of the technology to store renewable energy from wind, water, and solar power in the batteries of electric plugin cars plugged into the power grid.
I mentioned this in another article here awhile back.
http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog/_archives/2005/7/10/1012526.html
100s of millions of electric cars plugged in while sitting still (95% of a car's life is parked) at home, at work, at school or shopping. Storing power, days worth of power to even out solar and wind power peaks and valleys.
Then one can charge the car full up in a few minutes when needed, either by programming the charger in the electric car, say for the time one leaves for work, or simply waiting 5 minutes to get it back to full charge anytime it is need for commuting.
Car owners that plugin to help the grid smooth its peaks would be rewared with lower cost killowatts for their car and home. Depending upon how many storage killowatts their car provided to the grid. all simple with computerized electronic metering and billing.
Actually this makes it worth having battery storage in one's home too. Storing power for the power company and reducing your energy costs. And it fits right in with home solar, wind, and even farm biogas fuel cell/microturbine electric power generation (75% efficiency electric power from cow poop!).
The value of your killowatt hours gleaned from your own renewable energy system can be maximized by getting payed to help the power company smooth out peak demand and renwable energy supply.
Wednesday, September 20

Divert floods into wetlands, experts (finally)agree with me?
by
amazngdrx
on Wed 20 Sep 2006 07:22 AM CDT
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/19/science/19rive.html?incamp=article_popular
Yep, these experts must have read my blog, hehey.
http://amazngdrx.blogharbor.com/blog/_archives/2005/7/15/1032024.html
My previous recomendation on global climate disaster enhanced flooding, hydroelectric power, and restoring depleted aquifers.
Tuesday, September 19

The "toxic texan" reverses his global climate stance?
by
amazngdrx
on Tue 19 Sep 2006 11:44 AM CDT
http://thefraserdomain.typepad.com/energy/2006/09/bush_to_reverse.html#comment-22578138
So what? Is he going to claim no one can figure out wether or not global climate change is from natural or human sources again?
That's my guess. He needs a get out of investing real money in renewables clause for his fossil fuelish corporate banking friends.
At some point one has to realize that the "toxic texan" is the source of his very bad public image around the world, not the vast majority of humanity on planet earth that sees this administration as dangerous and the president as a puppet of corporate oil interests.
Even the most powerful leader of the most powerful nation on planet earth has to at least notice public opinion.
When even people like Powell turn on his policies, it maybe time for even the most faithbased of patriots to rethink their point of view.
I think what is happening now is that even the corporate boardroomies at exxonmob, ford, and GM are starting to get nervous about a possible invasion of Iran.
The Iraq thing is just not delivering oil. Making it a complete failure in even the board roomate's eyes. And now oil prices are falling, killing the record oil industry profits.
Will they rise after the election? OPEC is going to cut production to make it happen. Then the roomies will be happy again and let Rummy invade Iran? Maybe so.
Gasoline at 4 bucks per gallon might sweeten the invasion prospects for them. And the budget busting profits for contractors like Halliburton and other defense contractors give the roomates a place for their hedge funds to invest.
Budget busting weakens federal power and strengthens the hand of capital. That is Reagan Revolution at it's most basic.
Boost the power of corporations and erode the power of government until it becomes a mere figurehead, a rubber stamp for corporate lobbyist written laws. The 3 branches of government changing to a ceremonial role, like the British royal family did a scant century or so ago.
All power residing in corporate boardrooms. None with the representatives of we the people. That's the bottomline of invasion, occupation, and nation building of countries that are located over vast pools of oil.
Total transfer of the control of capital from government to corporations. And eventually to complete corporate governance
Friday, September 15

Google to tackle plugin vehicles!
by
amazngdrx
on Fri 15 Sep 2006 01:23 AM CDT
Thursday, September 7

Energy re-evolution roadmaps, mine and theirs.
by
amazngdrx
on Thu 07 Sep 2006 05:18 PM CDT

Mass production, come on Gates get it going!
by
amazngdrx
on Thu 07 Sep 2006 10:15 AM CDT
Wednesday, September 6

Cal Cars for profit?
by
amazngdrx
on Wed 06 Sep 2006 06:38 AM CDT
Saturday, September 2

Medicine plants: the ultimate in symbiosis
by
amazngdrx
on Sat 02 Sep 2006 05:08 PM CDT
Just as certain animals; dogs, cats, cows evolved symbiotically with humans, so did certain plants.
Corn, wheat, grains, vegetables, fruit trees all suceed because they help their huiman partners suceed. Medicinal plants do too.
Most of the commercial medicines available now were discovered by biochemists exploring traditional herbal cures. Getting back to that root of healthcare, symbiosis between medicine plants and humans might just cure the problems with the rising cost of healthcare that makes it unafordable for most of the people on spaceship earth who need it.
Uninsured in the US? They have to treat you anyway. For the billions in the poorer countries it's either Doctors Without Borders or some other heroic NGO or nothing.
Going back to symbniosis with the natural world could reveal a treasure trove of medical enlightenment. Let the developed world lead the way!
Tuesday, August 29

This proves the electric car with backup generator.
by
amazngdrx
on Tue 29 Aug 2006 11:41 PM CDT
http://www.greencarcongress.com/2006/08/pmls_inwheel_mo.html
80 mpg with a standard internal combustion generator. And 2 hours driving on batteries before you need to use it.
With a solid oxide fuel cell of the new CeO2 variety coupled to a microturbine this car could get 400 mpg on any liquid fuel. Destruction of Earth's climate as we know it could be stopped with this technology.

Green LAgirl on "Gristmill's" fixing agriculture
by
amazngdrx
on Tue 29 Aug 2006 08:35 AM CDT
http://greenlagirl.com/2006/08/27/interesting-quote-how-to-fix-agriculture
My comments on her thread:
Well he forgot to add: Take half the money saved from eliminating corporate welfare and turn it into tax incentives for small, local, organic farming. use the other half to pay down the deficit.
Use a few percenty of the first half to fund research into robotic farming designed to make organic farming using renewable electric power more efficient than chemical, diesel fueled, labor intensive farming.
That way organic farmers with a few acres can do it themselves on their computer connected robot that fertilizes (organic), waters, weeds,plants, harvests, all the stuff you would need to break your back doing, or break someone eles back, for below minimum wage.
Why do people use herbicide? Too much time and effort it takes to do it manually. Same with fertilizer, irrigation, and pesticides. Squash potato bugs manually? Yikes.
But a robot will vacuum them up and feed ‘em to your chickens, bwwaaaacckk (happy chicken music).
Now go tell some really rich garden loving people about this you LAers, maybe Laury David will fund this? You go LAgirl!
Wednesday, August 23

Feeding off the gas guzzlers, recycled energy re-evolution.
by
amazngdrx
on Wed 23 Aug 2006 09:28 AM CDT
Monday, August 21

Latest solar film tech
by
amazngdrx
on Mon 21 Aug 2006 07:59 AM CDT
Saturday, August 19

New fuel cell runs on any liquid fuel!
by
amazngdrx
on Sat 19 Aug 2006 09:37 AM CDT
http://thefraserdomain.typepad.com/energy/2006/08/franklin_fuels_.html
This could make a backup generator for electric cars based on fuel cell/microturbine technology a reality.
True multi-fuel capability, high efficiency, low weight, and low cost; all the qualities that are needed to replace internal combustion.
Since the new nano tech lithium ion batteries are so very expensive, only about a 50 mile range for an electric car is practical on batteries alone.
That is enough for most driving miles, but a good backup generator is needed to make electric cars able to compete in terms of utility with internal combustion. This sounds like the technology that will do it.
Coupled with a microturbine and electric drivetrain in an economy car it could give 200+ mpg on liquid fuel alone. And it would run on the cheapest liquid fuels.
And the whole design would fit into the space normally dedicated to an ICE (internal combustion engine), transmission, and related systems, at equal to or less that the ICE weight.
|
iieo@hotmail.com
This Month
| December 2006 |
| Sun |
Mon |
Tue |
Wed |
Thu |
Fri |
Sat |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
31
|
|
"the only way to achieve that is gradual moving back to agricultural society, which allows overall rate of photosynthesis to be higher than natural emmision of CO2."
There is another way.
How can the greenhouse effect be reversed back to pre-industrial levels?
Right now conservation reserve land in the US absorbs 1/3 of our CO2 emmisions. Expand that effect with new conservation land, like a Prairie National Park encompassing 1000s of square miles of northern prairie that doubles as a site for 1000s of very large scale 1000 foot wind generators.
That could absorb 2/3rds of present cO2 production. Then cut CO2 with plugin hybrids that use 1/10nth of the fuel we now use. Use distributewd renewable energy generation and storage to replace fossil and nuclear power plants.
Global climate disaster is reversible in a 20 year time span if thease steps are taken to actually reduce the amont of greenhouse gases.
Turning fertilizer and manure and other waste runnoff into biogas that is used in fuel cell/turbine power plants would eliminate a huge amount of methane, 20 times worse as a GHG, from the ecosystem. This extra nitrogen runnoff acting on lake and river sediment is releasing this methane now, with a huge greenhouse gas effect.
Then the cO2 from the fuel cell power plant is used to grow algae in solar collectors to produce biodiesel that runs in fuel cell backup generators in electric cars and powdered cellulose that runs in the fuel cell power plant.
And here's another huge effect that has so far gone unrecognized. Each vehicle containing a fuel cell/microturbine backup generator of around 20 kw can supply power for 30 homes when it is plugged into the grid and into a natural gas or biogas source.
100s of millions of these cars would solve the problem of storage AND backup generation for variable renewable energy sources like wind, wave, and solar power. A gas line could plug into your car at home or work, then another line could take the cO2 emmited back to a solar collector algae system for sequestration.
100 million cars x 20 kw generating capacity per car= 2 million mw of generating capacity. Present generating capacity in the uS is around 600,000 mw. So even 100 million of these cars could generate over three times the present electric power we now use. At 3 to 5 time present efficiency levels.
At the same time this plan would eliminate over 80% of present cO2 emmisions plus a yet to be calculated huge amount of methane emmissuons due to nitrogen runnoff from waste.
This along with the increase in conservation land could reverse global climate disaster within 20 years. The other alternative, the status quo, will stop the Gulf Stream conveyor and plunge the uS and europe into an ice age. If WW3 over oil with terrorists using nuclear weapons doesn't get us first.
A distinct possibility given nuclear proliferation combined with petrodollars that support terrorism.