Check out the third youtube video on this linked page.

http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2007/7/24/01547/5447#10

Edwards says no to nukes.  Obama says that nukes should be part of the mix.

Hillary says conservation, efficiency, and technological inovation.  Payed for by shifting the subsidies for oil companies to the effort.

She leaves a window for nuclear.  If innovation can solve the waste and cost issues, fine.

That comes back to a compromise.  Let thenuclear industry build a few new waste eating, less expensive, demonstrably fail safe reactors as a test project.  Examine the results and then reconsider nuclear.  Can it then be done safely and cost effectively.

This is why Hillary is presidential.  Edwards ought to be Attorney general.  Gore should be energy secretary.  Obama should be VP.  This is how leadership works.  The leader has the full picture, the people on her team have their own areas of competence.

It has notrhing to do with talking out of both sides of ones mouth or putting a finger in the wind.  It has to do with looking at the big picture.

I wish Edwards hadn't mentioned cellulosic ethanol, but at least hillary did not tout corn ethanol.

No one mentioned the GM Volt.  That name ought to have been dropped.