RENEWABLE ENERGY RE-EVOLUTION TO SAVE US FROM GLOBAL CLIMATE DISASTER, PERPETUAL OIL WAR, AND NUCLEAR PROLIFERATION.
    follow me on Twitter
    Year Archive
    RSS Newsfeeds
    amazngdrx Main RSS Feed Main Page RSS
    View Article  Indict Bush/Cheney. Every town ought to consider it.

    http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/us/AP-Bush-Warrant.html?ex=1202446800&en=3e73b5f3909ade0e&ei=5070&emc=eta1

    This could spread nation wide.  Start a petition in your town today, spring elections upcoming.  get it on your ballot.

    All politics is local.  Crawford Texans?  Get this ballot measure going!!

    Bust the kidnapping, torturing, murdering pair.  A 15 year old Canadian is being held incumminicado at gitmo right now by these scofflaws.

    Check out the announcement on the Brattleboro town website:

    Indictment Petition

     

    On January 25 the Town Clerk’s office received a petition from Brattleboro resident Kurt Daims.  Per Town Charter, a petition containing signatures from 5% of Brattleboro voters can be placed on the ballot for a Town-wide vote.  Mr. Daims’ petition did contain the required number of signatures.  At a meeting on January 25, the Brattleboro Selectboard voted 3-2 to place the petition on the ballot.  Reasons given by Board members voting in the affirmative centered on the belief that if a petition contained the required signatures, the voters should have the opportunity to vote on the matter. Reasons given by Board members voting on the dissent centered on the belief that articles outside the scope and authority of the Town should not go before the voters of the Town.  The Brattleboro Town Attorney has stated that the petition has no legal standing, as the Town Attorney has no authority to write an indictment and the Town Police Department has no authority to attempt an arrest of the President of the United States. 

     

    The Town will vote on the article on March 4.

     

    http://www.brattleboro.org/

    View Article  Clean Energy. Green Jobs. One Living Planet.

    http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2008/1/25/135055/623#70

    Just one more word
    Greenmom.

    Clean Energy.  Green Jobs.  One Living Planet.

    That's the bumpersticker.  That's a winner.

    View Article  GREEN LIFE? or... RADIOACTIVE COAL BLACK CHEMICAL DOOM?

    An infamous GOP pronouncement on politics in the media age, "We have a bumpersticker, they have an essay."  We need a bumpersticker phrase.  Here's a blog contest(s) to do that.

    http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2008/1/25/135055/623#13

    My entry:

    In this fashion..bumpersticker style...

                    GREEN LIFE?
        RADIOACTIVE COAL BLACK CHEMICAL DOOM?

    That'll get the advertising message across.  Then add a Hillary/Barack '08 sticker.  And a plugin hybrid sticker, and an organic farming sticker, and a NO MORE ENDLESS OIL WAR sticker...  and so forth.

    View Article  Bees, what is happening to them? The verdict is in, it wasn't your cellphone.

    The verdict is in, it wasn't your cellphone that is killing the insects that lay the golden ag, for farmers all over the globe.

    http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2008/1/25/162237/654#6

    Bee teevee
    The RFD cable tv channel has an excellent series on beekeeping.  It shows how selective bee breeding works.

    Bees have the genetic resources to overcome disease, but mites and diseases are being unintentionally selectively bred by the chemical ag industry through the application of 'cides.  

    As with human disease organisms, like antibiotic resistant bacteria, where the misuse of antibiotics accelerates the evolution of the bacteria beyond the capacity of the immune system to adjust.  The shorter life cycle of mites and disease organisms gives them an advantage over the host organism, the bees.  

    Could bee breeders help bees overcome this aspect of the problem?  They are fighting the basic laws of natural selection.  As are the the developers of new human antibiotics.

    Eliminate chemical agriculture, that is the way to fight this trend in the whole food system.  Animals fed antibiotics are transferring resistant disease organisms to humans.  Our food system has become the perfect breeding ground for accelerated evolution of disease organisms hosted by insects, animals, and humans.

    Bees are the high profile canaries in the coal mine, because of the huge effect of pollination rates on agricultural productivity.  Restore wilderness conservation land to the natural state, like a Prarie National Park would, and farmland to organic agriculture, and the system will be healthier.  

    And humans will be healthier and happier and spend far less financial energy on antibiotic after anitibiotic and treatment after treatment, always behind the eight ball in the vital sphere of natural selection.  Humans think they can beat mother nature, but she has the last word, we are all mortal.

    And that's the very last word.

    View Article  Water, energy, farm, economic, foreign policies, all interacting.

    Try new fractals, that distract from the steady state of decline.

    http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2008/1/24/92132/7414/#comment5

    You got it
    Only wind, solar, and other renewables don't have problems with drought.  They help reverse GHG climate change causing catastrophic drought.

    Nuclear, coal, and fuel farming all are dependent on massive quantities of water.  Polluting and contaminating it all the way.  4.5 gallons of water are wasted per gallon of ethanol gas guzzling.

    Wind pumped hydro power storage could capture flood waters in wetlands to serve as extra hydro dam power and a backup for river flow levels.  Low levels threaten endangered species, mainly fish, in these river ecosystems.

    Extra wetland/resevoirs restore groundwater aquifers, depleted by irrigation and backsup rivers depleted by metroplolitan water use.

    Solar power can be used to recycle city water and other water conservation techniques, like drip irrigation and manure/biomass/biogas production save and recycle huge amounts of water while actually increasing agricultural production and quality.

    These new, improved nuclear reactors that use no water?  Well, give the nuclear industry time to build a few of these, that also reprocess nuclear waste.  In 10 years rexamine the issue of nuclear power, after the data from these fully functrional experimental reactors is available.

    A completey transparent process that the public can trust would be needed.  These must be sabotage and theft (of nuclear materials) proof too.  It's a big design challenge.  I think it is more likely that renewable smart grids, conservation devices, organic farming, and plugin hybrid transportation will beat nuclear in terms of time to deploy, cost, and safety.

    And economic revival.  Instead of trillions of dollars to nuclear contractors.  The money would go to local businesses.  The gallon of gas you buy now, from oil company mega multinational taps, replaced by 75 cents worth of electricity bought from a farm down the road, over the smart grid.  Or free from the solar panels on your home.

    Anyway, the money would now stay in the local community, instead of in Dubai.  That is anti-globalization.  Relocalization.  It magnifies throughout the local economy, from business to employee to business..  and so forth.

    Nuclear and coal power dissappears the cash into shady multinational corporations that bribe local governments to pollute and contaminate at will.  Agribizz mega lobbyistys get the cash from fuel farming.  Destroying conservation carbon sink land to guzzle more gas.  But it's a green gas?  Duuuh..

    View Article  Sedentarians/Aerobians

    How does obesity relate to eco destruction?

    http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2008/1/21/194839/064/#comment27

    I would suggest this as a very sane new division of humanity.  Easily verified membership, totally voluntary, completely different value systems and motivations.

    Finally a rational way to be prejudiced!  "I just don't get along with Aerobians."  

    Or, "Those Sedentarians drive me nuts!"

    A better bigotry for a better, more correct..political correctness!  Excellent.

     

    View Article  Sustainable empire? An oxymoron.

    http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2008/1/20/203028/450#8

    This is an interesting challenge.

    Imagine how a sustainable empire might work.

    How does a commercial empire work?  It creates a technological revolution that increases productivity.  With that surplus, brought about by greater productivity, it takes over markets.

    The british empire used coal/steam/iron technology to grab markets from agrarian cultures.

    If a new commercial empire that switched to renewable energy/electricity/silicon, lithium, composite based technology and distributed manufacturing, could be started, would it capture markets?  Or would it be coopted by military dictatorship?

    Probably both.  The key would be to develop easily replicable manufacturing techniques, as it was with the coal/steam/iron age.  Certain pivotal inventions/discoveries pushed this commercial empire.  

    What are the key inventions/discoveries for the next commercial empire?  

    Plug and play renewable distributed power switches?  That use internet communication to regulate power flow.  From one home with a solar panel or biogas generator..all the way up to a whole continental grid, made up of millions of these computer switches.  All working together like a colony of ants.

    Plugin hybrid vehicles and renewable electric mass transpotation.  All the way from electric assisted bikes and plugin hybrid cars..to plugin hybrid buses and high speed electric commuter rail.

    Organic fertlizer/biogas energy systems and mechanized organic farming.  

    These are breakthroughs that magnify human productivity in terms of quality of life.  Rather than using more and more resources to raise human standard of living, these developments raise the quality of human life, in symbiosis with the living planet.  That way technological innovation and economic growth can be sustainable.  

    Human progress compatible with life.

    Would this lend itself to commercial empire if a Walmart, for instance, were to mass produce this model in nation after nation with local production?  Look at their CFL efforts.  How would a commercial empire ever be motivated to go after local production, rather than the lowest cost manufacturing model that Walmart uses?

    It's a big problem.  Empire, by it's very nature, concentrates capital and power in fewer and fewer hands.  Sustainable human progress needs protection from empire, that is what representative government was supposed to do.

    Taxation without representation?  Ring any bells?  The US was founded as a reponse to the Walmart of revolutionary war times.  The British East India Tea Company backed by the british army and navy.

    Would the spread of representative government along with earth friendly technology constitute an empire?  A new kind of empire?  I'm not sure if it would still fit the definition.  

    View Article  The anti-war-anti-GHG-war to end all oil wars.

    Some thoughts on how to get climate change legislation during a recssion.  It's the economy...again.  For bush it is an excuse for no action on climate and more tax cuts for his corporate crony contractors.

    http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2008/1/17/141151/026#15

    Economic decline
    Good point ce, if the economy declines, it already is in freefall, politicos will dodge the GHG issue.  Bush is wanting a stimulation now.  For all his favorite contractors and energy companies?  Yep.

      "Free" market free falling economy.  As gas prices keep snuffing out any revival before it starts.  And the housing industry keeps dropping off the cliff because of the (hedge fund created) mortgage crisis.  As tax breaks keep on being doled for corporations to outsource jobs.

    So how to get around this?  Couple the energy revolution with lower gas prices, kwhs are around 75 cents for eqivalent miles per gallon of gas.  make jobs in Detroit building millions of plugin hybrids for government service, federal, state, and local.

    Have big energy projects like FDR did, instead of building a power dam, build a huge wind farm out on the prairie.  And big conservation projects, carbon sink wetlands and prairie restoration and dangerous flamable dead wood buildup clearing (and recycling) in forests.

    Link economic recovery to renewable energy and conservation.  I ski past the old CCC (Civilian conservation corps) camp buiding foundations everyday.  Jobs created by FDR's programs.  

    Hillary talks about diverting subsidies for big energy to renewables and conservation.  She will do it like FDR did.  With money in people's pockets, paychecks for a job well done.  That is the best stimulus package.  And climate disaster energy policy.

    Giving more leverage over life on planet earth to hedge funds through "free" market trading of carbon or oil or the atmosphere or the oceans... is not going to be helpfull.  

    Think Costanza.."The Human Fund...  Money for people", rather than multinational gamblers and bush kleptocrats.

    Yes
    Like that Pan, more of that.  Geo heat exchange has the potential GHG savings of a very large portion of 36% of total GHG emmisions.  Power the circulation and heat pumps with a renwable smart grid and storage of clean solar, wind, and other clean kwh in the form of heating and cooling is added.  And even more than 36% might be saved?  

    How so?  Well the solar and wind and other renewable sources and grid installed will replace a larger and larger portion of other GHG sources as well.  Plugin hybrids strategically charged to store more power, and all other grid power uses supplied by the entire, completed grid eventually.

    Make sure all contractors for these projects only hire legal workers at fair wages.  Those are good jobs.  make all the devices here in the uSA, revive our economy just like WW 2 war production did.  The anti-GHG-war to end all oil wars.  That's the bumpersticker slogan.

    View Article  Vinod, a tough sell.

    Really very difficult to dissuade Vinod Khosla off ethanol.  He has many experts telling him he is on the right track.

    http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2008/1/14/1224/31738#1

    Blindfolded
    You are throwing darts with a blindfold on.  A function of committee based decision making.

    Ethanol, from cellulose or corn or sugar cane, does not have lower GHG emissions than gasoline.  The illusion of cleanliness is created by a misperception of the nature of soil and the carbon/CO2 cycle.

    You are claiming that since the plant mass used to make the fuel, removed CO2 from the atmosphere, you can simply subtract that amount of CO2 from the amount given off when the ethanol is burned to find the total GHG effect of fuel farming.  Adding a bit of CO2 for oil based tractor fuel and chemical fertilizer.

    Here is the flaw, the plant mass already growing on the land used for ethanol production, actually did remove CO2 from the atmosphere and sequester it in the soil, before it was used for chemical agriculture and eventually fuel farming.

    Furthermore, millenia of carbon was stored in that soil before it was exploited with chemical agriculture.

    Electric power from renewable sources actually does prevent GHG production.  Ethanol production prevents CO2 from being sequestered year after year.  To the tune of 1.8 tons of CO2 per acre per year in the case of prairie land.  That is the same as releasing more cO2, from the point of view of the carbon balance.

    The Audi plugin has the potential to be much cheaper to manufacture than hybrids like the Prius, with complicated series/parallel transmissions.

    It's true that a series hybrid with a much more efficient generator could have much higher average mileage than the Audi.  Something like the Boeing solid oxide fuel cell/turbine that they are developing for backup power on their airliners.  It is 60 or 70% efficient.

    As far as adoption speed, regular cars do not do well on ethanol.  Flex fuel cars would be a big capital mistake if better, cheaper batteries like the Firefly design go into mass production soon.

    Firefly has its graphite foam lead acid battery coming out to the semi market right about now.  This design doesn't suffer from material shortages.  

    You cited silicon as an example of shortage that increased the price of the end product.  Only refined silicon is in short supply, with silicon being one of the most abundant elements on earth.  Depite refined silicon shortage, the cost of silicon based computing devices per computing power has dropped precipitously over the decades of the computer age.

    Plugin hybrids don't need expensive quick charge batteries, hours long recharge is fine.  Pure electric plugins will need quick charge nano tech batteries.

    I don't know much about the efforts to increase ICE efficiency, but I see it involves adding computers upon computers and excessive complication to achieve small incremental advances.  Plugin hybrids are a huge advance all at once, in the case of the Audi design, with a lot less complication.

    A 50% increase in efficiency in an ICE could take a 40 mpg car to 60 mpg.  A plugin hybrid could average well over 100 mpg.  Probably over 200 mpg.

    As far as speed of rollout of plugin hybrids and a renewable smart grid, that will take time.  But these technologies both coexist well with the present system and chip away at it.  

    Solar panels can be added onto the present grid, and smart grid devices added to store that power as cooling or heating or as battery power in plugin hybrids.

    All the technologies you are invested in have a rollout time as well.  Cellulosic ethanol is lagging behind its promised rollout year after year.  I think plugins powered by renewable electricity will beat the rest, mainly because a gallon equivalent of electric "gas" costs 66 cents.  With solar panels on your roof, that payback in a few years, that cost quickly drops to near zero cents per gallon equivalent.

    As a gallon of liquid fuel, gasoline or ethanol, rises inexorably through 4, 5, 6, 7...  dollars per gallon.  You can't claim ethanol will reduce liquid fuel prices, since we only have enough spare biomass for maybe 10% of liquid fuel to come from ethanol.

    Put your money on the smart grid, internet enabled power grid that carries all the information now traveling through phone lines, cable tv lines, and cell phone towers, and uses distributed computing to smooth out the supply and demand on a 100% renewable power grid.

    View Article  Is anybody out there? Testing...

    Can bloggers get through to green billionaire investors?  Gates doesn't listen, neither does branson.  How about Vinod Khosla?  At least he participates, now will it change his mind in favor of electric transportation? 

    Over fuel farming, which all of the above named are boosting. 

    http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2008/1/14/02133/2988/#comment28

    Inflation
    Food price inflation is the main economic pain of fuel farming.  That is caused by food versus fuel.  Mass starvation is going on right now from soaring corn prices.

    Yep falcon, the more fuel that comes from chemical farming, the more biomass is burned.  Biomass should be recycled back into the soil to provide maximum carbon sink activity.  That happens with conservation land, wetlands, and forests and even with farms, organic farms that is.

    Fuel farming results in more GHG in the atmosphere, mainly because it takes carbon stored in the soil and releases it.  And it releases GHG that would normally be removed from the atmosphere.

    When corn is grown organically, compost that stores carbon is added to the soil.  Everything but the corn kernels are put back, the styalks, roots, leaves, maybe even most of the carbon locked up in the corn kernels are returned if the manure from the animals it is fed to is composted too.

    The balance depends upon returning the same amount of carbon to the soil as was extracted.  Productive living soil, like that under natural prairie grass, extracts 1.8 tons of CO2 per acre per year from the atmosphere and stores it underground.  The prairie soil was 20 feet thick when farmers first plowed it, now it is an inert chemical layer that blows in the wind, wherever chemical farming has ruled.

    All that millenia of soil storing cO2 was burned off by chemical farming, chemical burning.  And now each year the amount it used to store stays in the atmosphere.  The dynamic balance is the thing here.

    The self and mass deluding idea that because corn stores CO2 then it is released as ethanol fuel burned in cars, but is reabsorbed again and again, over and over.  Similar to the cycle of rain and evaporation in the water cycle.  The idea that constitutes zero emmision fuel is erroneous.

    The land used, not to mention the fossil fuel for tractors and chemicals, results in more and more cO2 in the atmosphere every year.  At least 1.8 tons per acre per year from prairie land converted to chemical fuel farming.

    Now compare this process of fuel farming and gas guzzling..  to..

    Charging up plugin hybrids with solar power harvested from already used land, rooftops of buildings all over the country.

    It leaves the land that is removing cO2 from the atmosphere alone.  It is only mounted on roofs.  And it supplies enough kwh to replace 90% of present liquid fuel use, through the plugin hybrid's 40 mile battery range.

    Renewable electricity charging plugin hybrids is technology ready to mass produce now.  Diverting any capital away from that solution dilutes it and slows the eventual cut in fuel consumption and GHG release.

    Plugin hybrids have the same utility as gas guzzlers and can be fueled at regular gas stations.  The additional investment by auto companies to add plugin power to existing vehicle lines is minimal.  An electric rear axle added to a regular front wheel drive car, plus batteries is it.

    Better to apply capital to this, than ethanol, Vinod.

     

    View Article  Vinod lured back to blog

    http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2008/1/14/02133/2988#7

    Now we can convince him where his billions in investment capital would be better spent on the energy re-evolution...  instead of ethanol farming.  Stay tuned, he has a three part series planned.

    View Article  Farm house!

    http://weather.uwyo.edu/upperair/sounding.html

    Found a log of weather balloon soundings.  Illuminating the effect of much taller, larger wind machines.   It seems when going from around 500 foot level to the 1000 foot level wind speed at least doubles.

    Since available power varies with the cube of the windspeed, that means the 1000 foot machine would average around 8 times the power with the same size rotor.  The 3.6 MW GE machine at 1000 feet?

    Maybe 30 mw, instead of 3.6.  Rumors in Europe are of a new 20 mw machine.  By expanding the rotor diameter by 40% and elevation to 1000 feet it maybe possible to reach 60 mw.  And average the same kwh production over time as  20 mw of coal or natural gas power production.

    50 of these larger machines would equal a 1000 mw coal or nuclear plant.  With no fuel or waste ever.  The great plains has plenty of room for these, plenty more could be floated  offshore on all three US coasts.  Waves could add additional power, as well as ocean and tidal currents.

    Gulf stream current could power the southeast with these floating wind/wave platforms by extending an underwater rotor beneath into the flow.  Only 5 mph of water flow has 180 times the power potential of the same speed wind through a wind machine rotor.  And the gulf Stream will not vary, unless arctic ice melt due to GHG stops it.

    When that happens it's too late to act. 

     Floating wind/wave/current platforms can be built in shipyard drydocks and towed into place.  No crane work out on the rough seas and underwater construction anchoring towers to the seabed, as with Cape Wind for instance.  And far less eco damage.  These can be far enough offshore to dissappear on the horizon.  Qwelling NIBMYism.

    Norsk Hydro is about to test the full size version of its floating wind machine.  These are analogous to the liberty ships that helped win WW 2.  New energy devices and policy to stop oil wars.  Stopping wars (before they start) is even better than winning them.

    View Article  Plugin hybrid guessing? Romm on CBS news Mon.

    We guess what the car he is talking about will turn out to be.  How will it make a plugin hybrid practical and affordable (price competitive with a Prius, with much higher mileage , 100+ mpg).

    http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2008/1/10/16651/4008

    Without a breakthrough
    Yep, sounds right buddy.

    The thing about a plugin hybrid is that it can take hours to charge.  Needing no very expensive quick charge nano lithium ion batteries.  A pure electric plugin needs a recharge time of minutes to compete with gas pump fueled vehicles.

    A plugin with a backup generator like the Volt, has it's own gas powered recharge onboard.

    By covering the average daily trip, with a 40 mile plugin range, average mileage remains stupendlously high.  But gas pump refueling gives the range and convenience drivers need.

    Great to see this explained on CBS news!  Good work Joe!

    Firefly
    Here's my favorite low cost battery for plugin hybrids Joseph.

    http://thefraserdomain.typepad.com/energy/2007/10/firefly ...

    Graphite and foam lead acid.  It looks really good from energy density, but is slower charge than the nano batteries.

    Better let Al know about this one.  When Hillary makes him energy secretary he can use the information, hehey.

    View Article  Joseph Romm: Most famous, influential envro-energy blogger?

    You be the judge.  Here is his tantalizing description of a "secret" energy strategy meeting with Al Gore.

    http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2008/1/11/102248/330

    And my take on what "secrets" might have been discussed:  First what Joesph Romm might have said on hydrogen powered cars and energy storage.

    It was ...
    I bet it was what he said on hydrogen on the History channel bio-d.

    An execellent analysis.  Hydrogen as an energy carrier not a source.  An inefficient carrier made worse by burning it in internal combustion engines.

    Hillary announced that she just heard about plugin hybrids, at a campaign stop in Commerce California.  It was wonderful, she said we ought to be making them here in the USA.

    Let's try to guess what the secret seminars were about?  A good game.  Joseph can say warmer or colder, hehey.

    1.  Plugin hybrids.
    2.  Distribuited internet enabled smart grids.  And how they can store energy and match supply and demand.
    3.  Offshore wind and great plains wind.
    4.  The latest solar PV.
    5.  Biogas, organic fertilizer production, and water reclamation.