Well I thought we could be happy that Hillary had some infitesimal chance after the Ohio and Texas wins.  But the mistakes continue, and I think her latest one is fatal.  Her meat headed campaign strategists must have assumed the 3 am ad worked? 

http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2008/3/4/18711/14244/#16

Hillary wants the wins she got in MI and FLA to count without a revote.  

And now she is campaigning for McCain in order to diss Barack, saying only she and McCain are fit to be commander in chief.  Leaving barack in the lurch if he wins the nomination.  

Aditionally it was her campaign that assured Canada that NAFTA was safe, essentially admitting that she is just lying about her opposition to it.  while at the same time accusing Barack of selling out on NAFTA.

Basically her campaign is counting on the ignorance of the voters to win, pandering to fear with that moronic 3 am ad.

She will lose, and it is because of her dishonest, conniving, and incompetent advisors.  But also because she chose to listen to them.  She would do the same in office.  It's really too bad, but she has proven barack should win.  

He was going to anyway, there really is no way she can get enough delegates now.  Even if she changed advisors and strategy, by packing caucuses like Barack's crew has.  She should have caught onto this after Iowa.

Then actually called for caucus revotes in MI and FLA.  Too late to change strategy now.  Oh well, in my opinion she has shown she is not fit to lead by letting these negative tactics go on.  they just can't work, that is obvious.  they will only hurt the democratic party ticket.

Let's hope Barack and his excellent team can beat McCain/Nader.  Otherwise we could very well see Iran become the next oil war target.  Hillary has let US all down, now she's going to let the whole world down by taking Barack down with her.

So goes the try at the first woman president, 20 points ahead up until she hired these rats to run her campaign.

This gives those who would normally be loyal clintonistas an excuse to desert the sinking ship.  They want to go with the winner for the good of the party and their own careers, but loyalty has held them from backing Barack.

With this traitorous behaviour of favoring McCain over barack, Hillary has given them an excuse to switch sides.  The 3 am ad and the lies on the NAFTA/Canada back channel meeting seals the deal.  It is all just too much chicanery and too traitorous to the democratic party.  And ultimately to the nation, given the danger of McCain bowing to neocon pressure to attack Iran.

What if another 911 incident comes along to aid the neocon plan to attack Iran?  Will Sen. Clinton vote to authorize that, as she did to authorize the war in Iraq?

Catch the clip of Reich on the Colbert Report. Colbert pressed him, and he finally admitted he has deserted the clintons for these very reasons I mention.